Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Driver who tore roof off his bus in crash at Ninewells Hospital told he can claim for unfair dismissal

Post Thumbnail

A Dundee bus driver sacked after he crashed into a footbridge at Ninewells Hospital and tore the roof off his vehicle has been told he can pursue a claim for unfair dismissal.

James Reilly was at the wheel of National Express Dundee’s No 17 bus when it collided with the bridge on a Saturday afternoon in November 2009. Nobody was hurt, but the main entrance to the hospital was closed for two hours.

After the company dismissed him, Mr Reilly tried to bring his case to an employment tribunal but was told at a pre-hearing review he had no reasonable prospect of success.

Mr Reilly appealed against this ruling as he wants to argue that the company’s dismissal process was unfair and he was not wholly to blame for the crash because he had not been adequately advised of a change of route.

The appeal was heard by a judge, Lady Smith, at the Employment Appeal Tribunal in Edinburgh. She was not ruling on the merits of Mr Reilly’s case, only whether or not it should have been thrown out without him having the chance to go to a full hearing.

Solicitor advocate Robert Hunter, for Mr Reilly, told her striking out a case was “a draconian power with devastating effects” which should be used only with restraint. He claimed his client was denied a fair hearing at which credibility and reliability of witnesses could be tested.

On the company’s behalf, solicitor advocate Edward Nuttman said Mr Reilly could have led evidence at the pre-hearing review and his failure to do so meant he was the author of his own misfortune.

In her written judgment, Lady Smith said the employment judge in charge of the review “went too far, too fast” in concluding Mr Reilly’s claim had no reasonable prospect of success.

She went on, “The employment judge has, in my view, paid no more than lip service to the principle that strike-out is a draconian measure and the hurdle to be overcome by an employer is a high one.”

Lady Smith has decided a full hearing of Mr Reilly’s claim will be heard by an employment tribunal at a date yet to be announced.