Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Development chief opposing latest plans at Glenisla Golf Club

Development chief opposing latest plans at Glenisla Golf Club

Councillors will be asked to reject plans for a three-star hotel, care home and retirement village in Alyth next month.

The proposal is the latest twist in the tale for Glenisla Golf Club that goes back to 2010 when the ambitious project gained outline planning consent from the local authority.

Perth and Kinross Council agreed to approve that plan despite being told to refuse it, and based their decision on the “potential” economic benefits which the development would bring to the area.

However, as this proposal was considered to be a significant departure from the development plan, the application was referred to the Scottish Government who subsequently indicated they did not wish to ‘call in’ the application and allowed the council to issue an approval decision.

As a result, another planning application was approved by the council in August 2013, and also allowed the applicant a longer time to submit their application.

However, Nick Brian, development quality manager with Perth and Kinross Council, will advise councillors to knock back this latest plan when they next meet.

“To this end, the application in its current form brings with it little in the way of sustainable economic benefit to the local area with the exception of opportunities for local trades and tradesman to become involved in the construction phase,” he said in his report.

“I consider the proposal unacceptable and not in accordance with the justification of the original approval.”

He also stated that he feels information supplied by the applicant concerning traffic movements and modes of travel does not quantify as an acceptable transport assessment.

The matter will be discussed at a meeting of Perth and Kinross Council’s development management committee on January 14.

In a report on the matter, Mr Brian said that, in his view, the “level of information” submitted by the applicant on land use, design principles and the implementation and delivery of subsequent phases could not be described as an “effective masterplan”.

He states: “What has been submitted is essentially a basic and simplistic development strategy for the site which only sets out an extremely general framework for differing land use across the site, without actually offering any specific details relating to the intended design principles, the urban form of the development or a robust timeline for delivery of the development.”