Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Forth Road Bridge’s cable anchorages under scrutiny

The Forth Road Bridge 45th anniversary.     The view from the south tower, looking towards Fife.
The Forth Road Bridge 45th anniversary. The view from the south tower, looking towards Fife.

Forth Road Bridge chiefs must examine the cable anchorages to ensure their long-term safety, experts have concluded.

The recommendation is contained in a new report due to go before members of the Forth Estuary Transport Authority (FETA) later this week.

FETA confirmed earlier this year it plans to spend £7.5 million on digging down to the anchorages at the South Queensferry end of the bridge.

Its engineers want to make sure moisture hasn’t got into the chambers and corroded the steel strands that hold the concrete filled tunnels together.

The decision followed the discovery of documents that highlighted problems encountered during the construction of the bridge in the 1960s. But FETA brought in a team of experts to assess whether the year-long project really is necessary before work begins.

The peer review panel, inclu-ding Bill Valentine, Transport Scotland’s chief bridges engineer, has issued its findings.

The experts agreed:FETA has to carry out an intrusive inspection of the anchorages, by excavating down to inspect the pre-tensioning strands. The checks will give the bridge authority sufficient confidence to either rule out the issue of corrosion altogether, or to consider suitable remedial actions. The process of assessing risks to users of the bridge and determining the best method of investigation has been advanced in a timely and thorough manner. There is no current and direct evidence that the bridge is in any way unsafe. Rather, the investigation is the only effective way to deal with concerns over the longer-term integrity of the anchorage strands. Carrying out the investigation will give FETA the ability to carry out a proactive assessment of the safety of the bridge, rather than having to react in an ad-hoc manner. Doing nothing is not a viable option.The panel also recommends a monitoring system should be installed to detect future corrosion within the anchorages, but has advised against full scale load-testing of the anchorage sockets and that cutting post-tensioning strands for sampling and testing should only to be considered as a last resort.

Their report means FETA can now start to look for a contractor to carry out the work.

The project is due to start in the autumn of next year, but it will be at least 2013 before even the earliest findings are known.

FETA is only planning to dig down to the anchorages at South Queensferry as the ground conditions there are poorer and the accounts of construction reveal there were more problems on that side of the bridge.

The papers, which came to light in 2005, highlighted the early depletion of galvanising on the steel pre-tensioning strands that hold the concrete in the anchorages together.

Barry Colford, FETA’s chief engineer and bridgemaster, welcomed the panel’s findings.

He said, “Our intention now is to press ahead with the investigation. It is the only way to deal with long-term concerns over the structural integrity of the anchorages.

“Excavating down to expose the steel will allow us to assess the current strength of the anchorages and will help in the difficult task of estimating future strength.

“Depending on the findings, challenging engineering decisions may have to be taken. But it must be stressed there is no direct or current evidence the bridge is in any way unsafe.

“Frequent inspections are carried out to monitor for movement within the anchorage chambers and no signs of distress or movement have been recorded to date.”