Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Plans to stabilise Bervie Braes in Stonehaven back on the agenda

Post Thumbnail

Plans to stabilise the crumbling Bervie Braes in Stonehaven and prevent landslips are to be resurrected.

Estimates for the job were ordered by Aberdeenshire Council following a major landslip and mudslide that saw 100 householders evacuated in October 2009.

However, the project stalled in April, after tenders came in £1.8 million more than the £3 million expected.

The future of the project was already in doubt before the extra cost was revealed, as some residents are refusing to return liability waivers to allow it to go ahead.

The Courier can reveal the work is back on the agenda the aim now being to target the sections which present the highest degree of instability in a bid to meet the budget.

A budget for the overall project was set at £3 million, of which £2 million has been pledged by the Scottish Government and the remainder by the local authority.Asked to approveMembers of Aberdeenshire Council policy and resources committee will be asked on Thursday to approve that officers should seek agreement with the Scottish Government on alternative proposals at a total cost not exceeding £3 million and report options to a future meeting.

Officers would also be instructed to continue to work with affected property owners to reach agreement. Members will be well aware of the background to the project, as no less than 17 reports have previously been considered by various committees of the council.

Infrastructure services director Stephen Archer said: “Tenders were invited in February 2011 from suitably experienced contractors to undertake the majority of the works.

“Three tenders were duly received, but the total estimated cost of the project based on the lowest tender and inclusive of projected fees, staff costs, client costs, contingencies and future drainage works was £4.8 million. This was £1.8 million above the available budget.

“Subsequently, Councillor Anne Robertson, leader of Aberdeenshire Council, wrote to Mr John Swinney, Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Employment and Sustainable Growth within the Scottish Government advising him of the situation and requesting additional funding assistance.”

A letter was sent on April 11 2011 and, after a reminder on May 26, with a response received on June 15.

“Unfortunately this made it clear that no additional money was available, but a meeting with Transport Scotland’s engineering specialists was offered to discuss possible options, he added.’Fresh proposals'”As a result of internal discussions and meetings with the council’s geotechnical consultants it was agreed that the only realistic course of action would be to develop a fresh set of proposals that could be accommodated within the available financial allocation.”

Following preliminary works, it was concluded that the proposed intervention on the slope would involve two strands: installing a remote monitoring system to observe ground water levels and targeted interventions to, as far as practicable, reduce the likelihood and impact of future slips.

A meeting subsequently took place with officials from Transport Scotland and they agreed that a risk-based approach was appropriate.

Further work is being undertaken by the council’s geotechnical specialists with a view to developing detailed proposals for review by Transport Scotland.

Mr Archer added: “This risk-based assessment includes the identification of the sections within the scope of the original scheme that present the highest degree of instability.

“This data is being coupled with the consequences of a failure at any particular section. By considering both factors together it is possible to identify the sections within the slope where the biggest improvement can be made in terms of reduced likelihood, and consequences, of future slips.

“Options are being developed that consider different solutions that seek to ensure that the maximum improvement can be delivered in terms of both risk and consequence.

“It is the intention to develop proposals that can be accommodated within the original financial allocation of £3 million.”

The estimated cost for the installation of remote monitoring is around £12,500, and will come from the existing financial allocation.

Running costs will be around £3,000 per annum should remote monitoring extend beyond a year.

The future spend on the project, including remote monitoring, is anticipated to be around £700,000 in 2011/12, £2 million in 2012/13 and £60,000 in 2013/14.