Sir, As referendum day gets ever closer we Scots must take issue with the claims being made by both sides. The No campaign is promising that more powers will be devolved to Holyrood the extent of this must be explained in full to Scottish voters before September 18.
Alex Salmond, Nicola Sturgeon and the SNP have to realise we need to be told the truth about vital issues such as the banking system; the currency; EU membership; oil and gas revenues; and defence and NATO. We are certainly not satisfied by the rather condescending assurances from the SNP that “everything will be okay on the day”. There will be no chance to go back to the status quo if things go awry.
Let’s examine oil revenues, for example. One might accept that they are still reasonably okay but for how long? Far too much emphasis in the separatists’ case for leaving the UK is based on an oil/gas economy.
In reality, would an independent Scotland actually fall heir to all the oil and gas reserves remaining anyway?
As I understand the situation, the right to exploit the resources in the seas surrounding the UK lies with the British Crown under the Continental Shelf Act 1964, in accordance with International Law.
Equitability rather than geography would be the guiding principle in court to decide upon this matter, and the case could drag on for a very long time.
This is only one of the questions to which the voters of Scotland deserve honest answers. Recent assurances by Mr Salmond and the SNP may never materialise.
Mr Salmond has been quoted on numerous occasions making reference to a fair share out of the assets in the event that Scotland breaks away from the UK. This is an argument that works both ways!
Robert I G Scott. Northfield, Ceres.
These terms are insulting
Sir, There has been some comment in the press about unpleasant language being used in the referendum.
I cannot recall reading a single letter or article by Better Together supporters that refers to the Yes Scotland campaign by name, preferring instead “nationalists” or “separatists”.
As an Englishman with most of my relatives living in and around London, I find both these terms insulting. The Yes Campaign want a democratic, accountable and peaceful government (Westminster is none of these) which is why we need independence. The desire for a decent government does not make us “nationalists” or “separatists”.
Just as irritating is the constant referral to Alex Salmond and the SNP as though they are the same thing as Yes Scotland. As a member of the Scottish Green Party this grates, as I am sure it does for the numerous members of the other parties also actively involved in Yes Scotland.
Is it too much to ask that those writing in the press make it clear whether they are commenting on the SNP or whether they are commenting on Yes Scotland?
This referendum isn’t about any political party or any politician; it is about who we trust to run our country for future generations. It is a choice between Westminster and a government elected by Scots.
Andrew Collins. Ladyburn House, Skinners Steps, Cupar.
Is Jenny just “stirring it”?
Sir, Does Jenny Hjul write to “stir up” or to inform?
So, more than one in six will leave after a “yes” vote?
I will put salt and pepper on my hat if, after a “yes” vote, in my small street of say 42 adults, seven or eight leave.
As for the future brain drain, none of us need look far to see the numbers of family and friends who have sought better prospects south of the border an “exodus” that has gone on for years as far back as 1707?
There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
Hugh J R Wylie. 1 Guthrie Street, Carnoustie.
Streets will be less safe now
Sir, I did not think there was anyone in authority who was more incompetent than The Mad Hatter who masquerades as a so-called justice minister, but the Chief Constable of Police Scotland runs a very close second.
The overwhelming majority of citizens don’t expect, or want, to see policemen strutting around our towns and cities displaying guns.
This insane policy makes our streets a lot less safe and, in fact, downright more dangerous.
Many criminals now will undoubtedly arm themselves before embarking on a criminal enterprise. In a very short period Stephen House has proved himself unfit for his office.
Robert Finlay. 6 Greenmount Drive, Burntisland.
Why so many local holidays?
Sir, I am wondering if anyone could explain to me why there are so many local holidays in Perth?
Many appear to be for no reason whatsoever apart from causing disruption to residents who are then unable to access services such as some pharmacies, GPs, libraries etc.
There is no other logical explanation, as far as I can see, that allowed for Monday July 28 to be classed as a local holiday.
In my opinion it was just an excuse for a day off. The number of local holidays needs to be cut down substantially.
Gordon Kennedy. 117 Simpson Square, Perth.