Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Anger as Fife Council is forced to pay for unwanted housing scheme in Crail

Work is underway on the housing development at Balcomie Green.
Work is underway on the housing development at Balcomie Green.

Angry councillors will have to pay out council cash to fund a controversial homes scheme in Crail they rejected.

A report to Fife Council’s Executive Committee said the local authority is legally committed to participating in the project next to Pinkerton Farm, Balcomie Road.

The North East Fife planning committee previously unanimously rejected a proposal by Stewart Milne homes to build 48 terraced houses on the site.

However, the plans were given the go-ahead by a Scottish Government reporter after the developer appealed.

Last month North East Fife planning committee councillors were amazed when they were asked to lend up to £1.5 million to the Crail project and a separate scheme in Rosyth.

And now their fears council money will be used to build a project they did not want have been confirmed.

East Neuk and Landward councillor Elizabeth Riches, pictured, said: “This was dealt with in a democratic manner.

“It was considered at the committee of 16 locally elected councillors, who unanimously said this was not suitable housing for Crail.

“A reporter, who is an unelected person, decided differently. The frustration that is felt by the local people is acutely shared by those people who were on the original committee.

“This was very hotly discussed in Crail. There were two or three presentations by the developer at community council meetings, very strong points were made and the developer did not take on board these concerns.

“The local people absolutely didn’t want what was eventually up for consideration and they couldn’t believe one individual could overturn this, so there are some very angry people.”

At this week’s meeting of the executive committee, Tay Bridgehead councillor Tim Brett queried what would happen if all the units were not filled by applicants meeting the necessary criteria.

Housing and neighbourhood services senior manager Alan Russell said: “Our information, based on demand, suggests that we will get the required number of people coming forward. I cannot tell you what plan B is.

“At the moment we are proceeding on the basis that all properties will be let.”

Councillor Brett added: “This now appears a done deal and there is no legal way we can get out of this and stop this.

“It is very frustrating, partly because of the planning reason and partly because so much of the council’s own funds are now going into this to a scheme which we’re not really backing.”

Councillor Riches added: “The principle of using money to try and help build affordable housing is supported but it’s the detail of how it affects the local area.

“The council needs to learn lessons and make sure there is consultation at an earlier stage.”