Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Danish defence model relies on having allies

Post Thumbnail

The country that the SNP is using as a model for an independent Scottish military could “definitely not” defend itself.

The frank admission of Denmark’s capabilities was made to The Courier by a senior Danish MP and two military analysts with extensive service records.

But they said being an active Nato member ensured the state’s protection, and questioned: “Who on earth would attack Scotland?”

The SNP has analysed Denmark’s military and proposed a £2.5 billion defence budget for an independent Scotland, about the same as the Scandinavian state.

Major Rune Hoffmann from the Royal Danish Army described the former Viking homeland as having a “warrior” culture, having been a front line in the Cold War, and playing significant roles in military interventions in the Balkans, Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya.

But asked if it could defend itself without the support of allies, he said: “Definitely not in a conventional war.”

Flemming Pradhan-Blach, who served with the Royal Danish Air Force in Bosnia, Afghanistan and Iraq and works as an analyst alongside Major Hoffmann at Copenhagen University’s centre of military studies, said: “But that is not the idea that’s why we are in Nato.

“The alliance is what makes us feel more safe, because you know you have these mutual benefits from being in Nato. We won’t be able to at all, but it’s not necessary. We don’t see it as necessary.”

Major Hoffmann, who served in Croatia and Kosovo, said: “Of course that means as well that we also have to do our part in Nato.”

John Dyrby Paulsen, foreign and defence spokesman for the ruling Social Democrats in Denmark, agreed the country could not defend itself.

“The official answer is ‘yes’, but the real answer is definitely ‘no’,” he said. “But yes, we are in an alliance that means something, we have a sort of defence capability within that alliance that would be sufficient for whatever we might use it for.”

Asked if £2.5 billion would be enough to set up a new armed forces, after a division of assets, Major Hoffmann said: “We are here, we are participating in international missions, so it (the budget) must be sufficient. I think we are pretty effective.”

Calum Ross has been reporting from Denmark throughout this week, interviewing a series of government ministers, senior politicians and leading academics, to find out what potential opportunities and pitfalls the Danish model could offer Scotland. See the final part of his investigation in Friday’s Courier.