Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

MSPs told of Laurencekirk junction accident toll

Traffic at the junction at Laurencekirk on the A90.
Traffic at the junction at Laurencekirk on the A90.

A Mearns accident blackspot would get a flyover were the A90 a new build project, campaigners have revealed.

Angus North and Mearns MSP Nigel Don claimed Transport Scotland had accepted traffic flow at the Laurencekirk junction is over the threshold at which a grade-separated junction would be provided on a new road.

The information came to light at the Scottish Parliament’s infrastructure and capital investment committee on Wednesday, where Mr Don and safety activist Jill Fotheringham debated the long-running issue with roads officials.

Mr Don presented video footage of the junction to highlight its dangers, including pictures of a tractor and trailer blocking one side of the carriageway as it crossed the central reservation.

Since being posted on YouTube it has attracted more than 1,100 views.

Committee members also asked witnesses from the community, the local authorities and Transport Scotland to describe the traffic situation where the A90 is joined by the A937 from Montrose and Marykirk.

Mr Don said: “There was agreement that the traffic flows at the Laurencekirk south junction exceed the levels at which a grade-separated junction would be provided on a new road.

“The frustrating thing is that the speed limit is presently seen by Transport Scotland as a satisfactory measure on the existing road.

“The argument that any upgrading of the junction should be paid for by developers was considered at some length.

“Again, I think there was agreement that there are not enough building opportunities near the south junction for this to be the case.”

Mr Don said it is now down to the committee to decide what further action it will take on the issue, which was initially sparked by a public petition from Ms Fotheringham.

He added: “I think the issues got a good airing and the onus is on the traffic professionals within Aberdeenshire Council, NESTRANS and Transport Scotland to find a way of providing the grade-separated junction it is entirely clear the community needs.”

A Transport Scotland spokeswoman said: “We will be supplying the committee with the additional information they requested.

“We also recognised the comments from both local community representatives and the local authorities on the good working relationship with Transport Scotland.”