Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Forth Bridge corrosion fears unfounded

Kris Miller, Courier, 01/03/13. Picture today at Forth Contact and Education Centre, South Queensferry - Original Forth Bridge construction workers returning ahead of bridge’s 50th anniversary.
Kris Miller, Courier, 01/03/13. Picture today at Forth Contact and Education Centre, South Queensferry - Original Forth Bridge construction workers returning ahead of bridge’s 50th anniversary.

Fears that the Forth Road bridge’s anchorages are extensively corroded have proved unfounded.

A £3.5 million survey to investigate the tensioned strands in the south anchorage tunnels yielded “unexpectedly good results” according to chief engineer and bridgemaster Barry Colford.

Before the excavation, carried out by John Graham (Dromore), it was feared there could have been significant deterioration within the strands. The concrete encased anchorages had never been inspected since the bridge was opened in 1964.

However, the good news was that the external surfaces of the ducts were in very good condition, and where exposed the strands were in good condition with no visible signs of corrosion of the wires.

In a report going before the Forth Estuary Transport Authority Mr Colford said there was enough evidence for him to conclude that the anchorages on the southern side of the bridge were satisfactory.

“Based on the information available from the investigation, I consider that the risk of the structural integrity of the southern anchorages being compromised has been reduced significantly as a result of these findings.”

He said the risk of having to replace the anchorages during the remaining service life of the bridge was “relatively low”.

As the system of grout and ducts “appears to have provided excellent protection” for more than 50 years that system should be replicated when resealing the anchorages.

There will be a programme of monitoring the anchorages for signs of corrosion emanating from sockets or plates along with checks for movement of the plates themselves.

While it is believed the risk of damage to the bridge was low, the monitoring would provide a low-cost way of being assured the anchorages were not deteriorating.

The news comes only months after it was revealed the life span of the 48-year-old bridge could be decades longer than previously thought after dehumidification equipment was used to dry out the main supporting cables that had suffered corrosion.

An inspection indicated the dehumidification project had significantly slowed down corrosion of the thousands of individual steel wires that bear the weight of the bridge.