Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

White Paper holds few surprises for Scotland’s farmers

White Paper holds few surprises for Scotland’s farmers

Those who keep abreast of Scottish farming politics would have found little to surprise them in Scotland’s Future White Paper.

The claims of what might be achieved in an independent Scotland and the criticisms of what has happened in the past under UK governance will all be quite familiar.

The message is that Scotland’s farmers and crofters have been repeatedly let down by Westminster governments which have failed to prioritise Scottish farming in domestic policies and in European negotiations, and have argued and acted against Scotland’s interests.

Some topics aired in the White Paper have had much exposure in recent weeks.

Scotland has had the third-lowest average direct payment per hectare in Europe, and the position will be worse in the reformed CAP with the country having a lower average rate per hectare than any other member state in Europe and than the rest of the UK.

The Westminster Government is also criticised for disadvantaging Scotland further by deciding, despite cross-party opposition in the Scottish Parliament, to distribute across all the counties of the UK more than 220 million euros of agricultural subsidy uplift, received from the EU to promote convergence.

The uplift is a direct consequence of Scotland’s lower payments, and should have been used to benefit Scottish farmers who have the lowest per hectare rates, says the White Paper.

The claim is that these problems and disadvantages would not occur in the future if Scotland had direct representation.

There is, however, a fairly remarkable claim buried within the text. The White Paper claims that in an independent Scotland farmers and crofters would continue to receive CAP payments because the budget is already set until 2020.

“Quite how that ties in with the almost inevitable likelihood that an independent Scotland would not be an EU member state for some or indeed all of the period from 2016 to 2020 is not explained clearly.

There is also an assertion that an independent Scotland would qualify for future member state funding increases.

The prospect of agricultural support being cut completely if Scotland remains in the UK is also raised.

“Scotland faces the possibility of leaving the EU because of Westminster’s planned in/out European referendum.

“If there is a vote to leave the EU, Scottish agriculture and our rural industries will no longer be part of the CAP and will be in the hands of a Westminster government with a stated policy of drastically reducing or even ending farm payments,” says the White Paper.

The vexed question of levy income from livestock reared in Scotland but slaughtered south of the border being used to promote beef, lamb and pork from elsewhere is given as an example of a grievance that has to be addressed.

Scottish Liberal Democrat MEP George Lyon said: “This was the SNP’s chance to answer many of the big questions that farmers have been asking about independence. They failed to do so. On agriculture what we got was a wish list without a price list.”

“The last member states to join the EU received a small fraction of the average Single Farm Payments.

“An independent Scotland would be free to try and negotiate a better deal, but it is not Alex Salmond who would hold the whip hand during talks in Brussels.”