Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Landowner ordered to remove ‘ugly’ Glen Clova track by Scottish Government

The hill track in Glen Clova, Angus.
The hill track in Glen Clova, Angus.

A Scottish Government reporter has upheld enforcement over the creation of a controversial track across an Angus Glens hillside in what campaigners have claimed is a landmark ruling.

The decision ends a long-running battle over the 1.5 kilometre track after the appeal lodged against Cairngorms National Park Authority’s enforcement notice ordering landowner Hugh Niven to remove it.

In a newly-released judgement, Scottish Ministers reporter Allison Coard upheld the enforcement notice and ordered the land to be restored “so far as is reasonably practicable” within one year.

The Glen Clova hill track.

Mr Niven had argued the track was essential for forestry and farming work, transporting tourists to the Glen Clova Hotel and servicing a hydro plant in the glen.

He was previously given 12 months from last October to complete a series of remedial works under the enforcement, including the removal of  “spoil mounds” reported next to the track.

Mr Niven argued his work to “formalise” and develop the “existing route” had not broken planning rules.

The reporter said there was “ambiguity” about when the track works had been carried out but added Mr Niven had not “adequately demonstrated that the
substantive engineering operations” were  “immune from enforcement”.

Ramblers Scotland policy manager Helen Todd, the co-convener of the LINK Hilltracks campaign group, said: “This is a landmark result, and sadly one of very few examples of an authority feeling able to commit enough time and money to retrospectively tackle unauthorised tracks.

“This ugly track is scarring the landscape in this historic, protected glen – and we look forward to seeing the hillside restored within the coming year.

“All Scottish landowners should take note of the decision, and the expensive restoration job that the landowner will now need to carry out.”

Beryl Leatherland of Scottish Wild Land Group, also co-convener of the LINK Hilltracks group, said: “The case highlights the urgent need for the Scottish Government to introduce stronger controls over vehicle tracks in our hills – to boost local democracy, improve construction standards and protect precious environments from further damage.”

Currently, landowners simply need to tell authorities before building tracks to support agriculture or forestry and full planning permission is generally not required.

Campaigners say they believe tracks are often created to support shooting activities and therefore should be subject to a planning application.

Mr Niven declined to comment on the appeal outcome.