Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Legal challenge to Alyth windfarm fails to sway Court of Session

Post Thumbnail

A shepherd has lost her latest court battle against a windfarm on the Angus and Perthshire border, despite her concerns about “highly protected” local wildlife.

Helen Douglas took RDS Element Power to the Court of Session in an attempt to stop plans for seven wind turbines at Tullymurdoch Farm near Alyth.

Locals have spent five years compiling evidence that wildcat and osprey live within 300 metres of the windfarm.

After that action failed in December, Ms Douglas applied for a judicial review of Perth and Kinross Council’s latest approval for 11.8 miles of underground cabling towards Coupar Angus, and larger blades for some turbines.

Sir Crispin Agnew QC said her grounds of challenge were that the council acted unlawfully in granting the modifications as it did not have sufficient environmental information about the presence of the animals, had left the possibility of “significant effects” to them by imposing conditions on the development, and gave “inadequate reasons” for its decisions.

Lord Drummond Young stated the court agreed with the Lord Ordinary’s opinion the council acted properly in appointing an environmental clerk of works to oversee the project, and assumed all parties would act “in good faith” if evidence of protected wildlife emerged during construction.

Lord Drummond Young commented: “If further information is provided to the local planning authority in a case such as the present where the planning permission relies on conditions requiring the subsequent assessment of protected species, it must in our view be assumed that the authority will act in good faith and pass the information on to the developer and the ecological clerk of works.

“In addition, Scottish Natural Heritage has been able to provide detailed comments on protected species in the vicinity of the present developments.

“Once again, it must in our opinion be assumed that they will continue to act in good faith…through these routes continued public participation is likely to be achieved, on the assumption that there are members of the public who are interested in the protection of wildlife in the vicinity of the development.”

After the initial Court of Session ruling, Ms Douglas said: “Destruction of our natural heritage masquerades as the pursuit of green energy.

“My sadness after this judgment is immense.”