Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Farming sector really can play starring role

Resources must be committed to finding workable solutions to agriculture’s role in mitigating climate change.
Resources must be committed to finding workable solutions to agriculture’s role in mitigating climate change.

If you scanned the telly schedules earlier this week you would be forgiven for thinking farming had suddenly become fashionable.

Unfortunately, most of it didn’t make for savoury viewing.

On one night alone the options included Meat the Family, a series where families challenge their meat-eating habits by looking after farm animals at home; White House Farm, which relived a multiple murder; and Apocalypse Cow, evangelical environmentalist George Monbiot’s condemnation of all meat production as bad for the planet.

Monbiot’s whimsical solution is to replace beef, pork, lamb and chicken with a “cultured” alternative –laboratory-grown meat. He claimed this approach would free up the countryside to plant trees which are, in his eyes, the world’s sole environmental salvation.

There must have been thousands of farmers shouting at their TV screens about grassland’s ability to capture and store carbon, because the English NFU spokeswoman – there to provide the “balance” – certainly wasn’t up to the job.

An occasional glance at Twitter during the programme confirmed the industry’s collective blood pressure was rising as animal rights and vegan groups jumped on the bandwagon, although some people commented their favourite bits of the hour were the regular close-ups of cows’ noses!

The programme created more of a stir than worthier debates at the Oxford Farming Conference, a venue the Environment Secretary Theresa Villiers used to give vague assurances about protecting high food standards when the UK seeks trade deals after Brexit.

A day later she told BBC’s Countryfile programme that the ban on hormone-treated beef and chlorine-washed chicken would remain in place in future trade deals.

It’s a welcome, albeit long overdue, statement.

My series of reports from the Midwest this week gave a flavour of the differences in production methods between the UK and the States, so if the government holds to its promise not to dilute our high standards of food safety and animal welfare, the Villiers commitment is a major step forward – but we need to get it nailed down in legislation.

The visit to Illinois and Wisconsin – just one of many trips organised and paid for by the Trump administration as trade talks and deals between the UK and the United States become more imminent – was billed by the State Department as an opportunity to “dispel the myths” by taking us to farms, scientific laboratories, a national food show and food companies.

I was sceptical, but the tour made no attempt to hide any of the fundamental differences in production methods. We watched beef farmers implant cattle with hormones and heard about lower levels of traceability; cereals producers extolled the benefits of using GMO soybeans but worried about public opinion; and dairy cows with docked tails were milked while we interviewed dairy farmers.

Mind you, despite making requests in advance, we didn’t get access to poultry or pig farms, and I didn’t see any chlorine-washing of chicken.

But while most of these differences in farming methods are well documented, the similarities between those who work on the land across both nations now seem just as significant.

American farming families work as hard and share many of the same challenges as their counterparts here, and they too are under pressure to reduce their industry’s greenhouse gas emissions and to cut back on the use of antibiotics in livestock.

Their margins are tight and they face escalating criticism and misinformation from the anti-meat lobby. And on top of that, America’s crippling trade war with China means that even with state compensation, they’re fighting for survival.

Far from being fashionable, farmers on both sides of the Atlantic are blinking in the headlights of unprecedented hostility from armchair experts who have never been hungry in their lives.

If environmentalists, governments and the general public really care about their future food supply, they must ensure resources are urgently committed to finding workable solutions to agriculture’s role in mitigating climate change.

Relentlessly being cast as the bad guys is taking its toll on this industry.

nnicolson@thecourier.co.uk