Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Tree planting support increased as study concludes forestry is more profitable than sheep

The study by Sheffield University suggested sheep farmers could be more profitable if they let their land naturally regenerate into woodland.
The study by Sheffield University suggested sheep farmers could be more profitable if they let their land naturally regenerate into woodland.

In the week shoppers are being encouraged to “love lamb”, new research from Sheffield University has concluded sheep farmers would be better off if they turned their land over to trees.

The study, which was published in the journal Environmental Research Letters, coincided with the Scottish Government’s announcement of an extra £160 million to increase new planting.

The funding includes a new capital grant scheme for farmers.

The Sustainable Agriculture Capital Grant Scheme (SACGS) will open later this month and run as a pilot scheme for a five-week period, with the offer of grants of up to £20,000 for producers to purchase new equipment.

However, Sheffield University’s Centre for Sustainable Futures said British sheep farmers didn’t even need to plant trees but could be more profitable by letting their land naturally regenerate, which would allow them to sell credits for the carbon dioxide (CO2) the forest absorbs.

The study found that farmers with at least 25 hectares of land could turn a profit if they allowed it to naturally regenerate into native woodland and were paid as little as £3 per tonne of CO2.

If businesses looking to offset their emissions were willing to pay £15 per tonne of CO2, they calculated, forests of any size would make a profit.

The study’s lead author, Professor Colin Osborne, said: “Sheep farming in the UK is not profitable without subsidies, but forests that sell carbon credits can be economically viable – so it makes sense for the government to help farmers transition.”

In his announcement of new funding for forestry, Rural Economy Secretary Fergus Ewing said: “We know farmers and crofters want to contribute to our climate change ambitions and to cut their emissions and farm more sustainably.

“Helping them to change their practice by ensuring they have access to the right equipment, tools and knowledge is key. The new £10m SACGS will provide support to do this.”

NFU Scotland president Andrew McCornick acknowledged that for a “significant number” of farmers, forestry has become an increasingly important diversified income stream.

He added: “The availability of increased funds for planting will allow more farmers and crofters to identify if investment in trees is the right business decision for them.

“While we await detail on the type of investment that will qualify, it is a pilot with potential to help cut emissions on farm while improving the bottom line of the business.”

The National Sheep Association was contacted for comment.

nnicolson@thecourier.co.uk