Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Call for farm sector to be ‘reimagined’ for future

Farmers will face environmental, productivity and social challenges after the UK leaves the EU
Farmers will face environmental, productivity and social challenges after the UK leaves the EU

A key Defra civil servant painted a bleak picture of a broken and inefficient British farming system, then outlined the challenges of designing new policy which would create a better future for the industry.

At a conference on the future of rural communities in Scotland and Ireland, Professor Ian Boyd, chief scientific adviser at Defra, told Scotland’s agricultural elite that farmers faced environmental, productivity and social challenges which required the sector to be reimagined in a “very, very different form” in future.

He said: “We have three key challenges.

“One is around a social challenge which is about keeping people on the land because we have cultural heritage we want to maintain.

“But we also have a productivity challenge and certain parts of the farming sector will be asked to step up to deliver that.

“And then there’s an environmental challenge, and that cuts across all aspects of farming in some way or another.”

Referring to environmental pressures on the industry, he pointed out the inefficiencies and unsustainability of current systems and added: “We are nowhere near ambitious enough in asking what farming is going to look like in one or two generations’ time, because it cannot look like it does now.”

Prof Boyd went on to warn that stakeholder expectations of post-Brexit policy were incompatible with the likely outcome.

“In the discussions that are going on around a replacement for the Common Agricultural Policy in England, everyone thinks they are going to get something positive out of it and actually I don’t think that’s possible. Some people are going to be losers and some are going to be winners,” he said.

“The question is how are you going to compensate the losers.”

Prof Boyd spelled out the industry’s reliance on direct payments and its vulnerability to volatile markets and exchange rates and said the challenge for policy was to develop a system by which farmers who were unprofitable could be moved into a “profitable state of business”.

Some parts of the industry would need support, and it was important that farmers were given time to adapt to the changes they faced.

He said he wasn’t responsible for making policy, but nevertheless went on to describe what he thought “might work”.

“We need clear and balanced objectives, transition over time to allow social adaptation. We need to make hard choices. We need a system of support that is sensitive to sector ambitions and to geography: there are certain parts of the country, like Scotland and Ireland or the north of England, where different sorts of support will be needed relative to say Lincolnshire or East Anglia.”

He added: “We need to reward outcomes, not inputs.”

nnicolson@thecourier.co.uk