Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

JENNY HJUL: Only the Lib Dems have had anything like a consistent approach to Brexit

Leader of the Liberal Democrats Jo Swinson MP.
Leader of the Liberal Democrats Jo Swinson MP.

One thing most of Britain’s political parties have in common over Brexit is their bitter internal divisions. Now we have a general election looming, those differences will no doubt set the tone of the campaign.

The Tories have long torn themselves apart over membership of the European Union, but the other parties have been exposed as almost as fractured.

The Labour left has harboured Europhobes since Tony Benn but who would have guessed at the extent of its inner turmoil between natural, though closet, Leavers (Jeremy Corbyn) and the unflinchingly Blairite Remainers?

And in Scotland, the Nationalists have shown themselves to be just as split, despite the current leadership’s denial over its large Leave element.

In the 2016 referendum, almost half a million separatists voted to quit the EU, rather inconveniently for Nicola Sturgeon, who has doggedly aligned her independence agenda with staying in Europe.

Only the Lib Dems have had anything like a consistent approach to Brexit, with their unambiguous Remain position helping to boost their ratings in opinion polls.

But beyond the mainstream, where special interest movements lurk, Brexit is surely a simpler matter. If you join the Brexit Party then you are for Brexit.

And if you jump on the People’s Vote bandwagon, as millions of marchers have done, then you are a solid Remainer in favour of a re-referendum.

Or are you? If you thought the blood spilled over Brexit among our elected representatives was messy, then brace yourself for the fallout from the unelected lot.

Just as they should have been preparing to throw their weight behind pro-Europe MPs, chaos has descended on the People’s Vote, an umbrella for several organisations, now all feuding among themselves over their message, direction, tactics, personnel – just like a normal political party in fact.

With the issue of reopening the referendum now on the back burner, the People’s Vote may be a footnote already. But where do all its sympathisers go?

Roland Rudd, brother of Amber and “PR guru” by profession, has driven the campaign as chairman of Open Britain, the biggest group in the alliance.

He has faced challenges recently from other prominent People’s Voters, including Blair’s former spin doctor Alastair Campbell and that other leading Blairite, Peter Mandelson.

They accused Rudd of trying to make People’s Vote too pro-Remain, which is an odd suggestion, as all the people I know who have marched under the banner believed that is exactly what they were giving up their Saturdays at Waitrose for.

Campbell and Mandelson have been attempting to steer People’s Vote along a more nuanced path, more inclusive of soft Leavers, drifters from both the Tories and Labour, and fickle floaters.

The tension erupted over the weekend when Rudd, apparently overstepping his authority, removed a couple of leading People’s Vote staff.

Now the whole edifice appears to be cracking, with mass walk-outs, recriminations and calls for calm chats.

One of the sacked staff members, Tom Baldwin, a one-time spokesman for Ed Miliband, said of Rudd: “He’s making the mistake that I think a lot of businessmen do when they dabble in politics, which is to think that because they have a certain title and a board they then own the campaign.

“The clue’s in the title – People’s Vote campaign belongs to the people.”

Ah yes, but only the people who side with the People’s Vote. Baldwin dismisses his ex-colleague in much the same way their organisation dismisses more than half the electorate.

This has always been a problem for Leavers, who saw the People’s Vote as a smug upstart, attempting to snatch away their unexpected victory.

It has also been a problem for many Remainers, though, who found the People’s Vote cry for a repeat of June 2016 condescending towards, well, the people.

Much as we would love to turn back the clock to the pre-Brexit peacetime, staunch defenders of British democracy are compelled to go with the decision of the majority and hope for as painless a Brexit as possible.

Meanwhile, the middle class mob that demanded, without irony, to have its voice heard and gave a platform to SNP opportunists, Greens, Delia Smith and Mariella Frostrup, may have to find alternative political homes.

If the People’s Vote can’t coalesce around its single issue, why should the public coalesce around the People’s Vote?

For real people’s votes, you can’t beat the (secret and celeb-free) ballot box – which is what we’re going to get before Christmas.