Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

OH MY WORD: Campaigning politicians should simply explain their reasoning in written English

Post Thumbnail

We are, mercifully, close to the end of this election’s campaigning phase. I am tired of it all, but then I was tired of it before it started.

I don’t like the intemperate language written and spoken during elections and referendums. I think people lose control of what they are saying in their strained, wild-eyed efforts to convince us that they are unquestionably right, their opinion must be the only one that counts, and that the opposition view is stupidly and entirely wrong.

People lose the ability to conduct rational discussion. They become more extreme, more unpleasant versions of themselves. Too many abandon any semblance of toleration for those with different opinions.

Please, could we all just calm down?

This election, there has been a phrase that has particularly grated. When asked a difficult question (or sometimes an easy question) politicians of all stripes trot out the words: “Let me be perfectly clear. . .” or “My party has been perfectly clear on this . . .” They then give an answer that isn’t even remotely “clear”.

There is nothing new in this, of course. Politicians have been refusing to properly answer questions for centuries.

Sometimes they don’t mean to use the language badly. They make mistakes, or at least I hope they are mistakes. I’ve heard the Scottish vote referred to as “a political prawn”, which sounds fishy. I’ve also heard politicians describe themselves as “scrapegoats”, which sounds itchy.

I’m weary of the shouting. I have a low opinion of people who talk over others. I like considered answers given to sensible questions.

So I’m suggesting a new way for political campaigns to be conducted. Politicians should be sat down at a desk with a pencil and paper. No devices giving online help, not even a dictionary or thesaurus. All they’d have is their brains.

They could then write down their policies and explain their reasoning in plain English.

The public would examine their pieces of paper, taking into account sentence construction, spelling, punctuation, vocabulary, and even the neatness of handwriting. In fact, I’d want to see whether they held their pencil correctly between thumb and forefinger, with the shaft pointing up their wrist.

We would judge their words, not their ability to shout loudest.

It would be less noisy, less divisive and, I believe, an accurate indicator of whether they are the sort of person we can trust to run the country.

 


 

Word of the week

Chiliad (noun)

A group of a thousand things. EG: “I could list a chiliad of reasons why I dislike election campaigns.”


Read the latest Oh my word! every Saturday in The Courier. Contact me at sfinan@dctmedia.co.uk