Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

JIM SPENCE: Roy Keane defended big earners this week and he’s right…to use current economic maelstrom to attempt to slash player wages is out of order

Man United legend Roy Keane this week defended footballers
Man United legend Roy Keane this week defended footballers

Top football players shouldn’t be pressured into taking pay cuts.

Roy Keane defended the big earners this week and he’s right.

The growing demand from some quarters that top players alone should voluntarily accept a cut in wages is ridiculous.

In most societies, we have a system which differentiates wages of groups of workers or individuals.

We may well think that football players are hugely overpaid, but that is a different thing from expecting them to voluntarily agree to a change in their contractual terms, to quell a misguided sense of anger at their good fortune.

Taking a wage deferral in these unique circumstances may be a fair request, but not wage cuts, which are a different thing.

To use this current economic maelstrom to attempt to slash player wages is out of order and players should resist any such attempts to shame them into accepting this blackmail.

Civilised society rests on the legal concept of contract, with folk making a bargain and sticking to its terms.

The huge clubs in England and elsewhere are backed by multi billionaire investors – if they feel sanctimonious enough to ask players to take a hit in the pocket, they should start with their own bank balances first.

We shouldn’t be distracted by the number of zeros on the end of a football player’s salary, those numbers are a result of a freely-entered-into bargain between consenting parties.

Many players are already, either publicly or privately, generous in their commitments to less fortunate folk. But even if they weren’t, that’s their business.

Arbitrary moral judgments singling out football players are cheap shots.

I wonder too if there’s a touch of class politics in play here.

Football players, mainly from a working background, earning seven-figure salaries can be an easy target for those who regard themselves as eminently over qualified but underpaid.

If we want to change society so that some folk don’t earn vast sums while others earn a pittance, that’s a political decision.

But Keane is right that players should not be pressured to accept wage cuts, a call which appears to be motivated by sheer jealousy.

The ‘are football players overpaid argument?’ isn’t a valid one here.

For starters the vast majority of them are not.

Certainly in Scotland the bulk of players don’t come close to the super-rich category but even that is irrelevant.

Top players earn their big money as a result of big broadcast TV deals, with all the advertising revenue that brings in.

Those salaries don’t grow on trees. They come from you and me buying the TV packages and the products advertised.

We all have the choice whether to subscribe to those deals or not.

If we ever return to a situation where salaries in the top-earning football countries once again depend on crowd receipts instead of TV income, as they do to a major extent in Scotland, then those huge salaries will become a thing of the past.

But for as long as we have the present situation, singling out rich footballers as scapegoats is simply the politics of envy.