Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

SNP leadership has reduced independence to a hollow threat

Nicola Sturgeon has issued various threats over Brexit but Alex can see no real reason why Theresa May's Westminster government should take much notice.
Nicola Sturgeon has issued various threats over Brexit but Alex can see no real reason why Theresa May's Westminster government should take much notice.

This is the tale of the ball that doesn’t bounce.

On December 23 the Scottish Government published its paper on Brexit – Scotland’s Place in Europe.

This admitted that there was no leverage Holyrood held over Brexit other than Scotland becoming independent.

The Scottish majority to remain in the EU didn’t override the UK constitution; Westminster was still sovereign and Scots had to go along with the UK majority to leave.

Nonetheless, the document did issue a series of demands which Theresa May should concede.

It was said at the time that the “ball was in May’s court”.

Last Friday there was much excitement over the First Minister saying that if there is a soft Brexit then she will not hold an indy referendum for the foreseeable future.

This was a restatement of a position set out in October 2016.

Perhaps spooked by coverage which suggested this might be a retreat from the true cause, she gave an interview two days later to The Andrew Marr show which used a more bullish tone.

No bluff

“I’m not bluffing” was the headline as Nicola issued a warning to Theresa May that Scotland better get a deal else there will be another independence referendum.

Ball-wise and court-wise, that sounds like Nicola holds the racquet.

It also sounded like she was building up to announcing the date for a new vote.

Minutes later Theresa May, on another Sunday morning talk show, said “we are coming out (of the EU)”.

Which, and I’m no sports commentator, was May saying she really didn’t care about balls or courts but was going ahead with Brexit.

Sturgeon’s bluff had been called – she had to name a date soon or she’d look like the girl who cried wolf.

Come Monday, nationalists were choosing to interpret “I’m not bluffing” as a signal that come March, when the PM is due to set out her Brexit goals, should May say that the UK is exiting the single market, then Nicola would name a date for Indy2.

That too seemed to spook Nicola, who then appeared in another broadcasting studio to tell everyone that the date would not be in 2017.

To try and understand what all this meant, I asked a senior spokesperson if we should expect a referendum date to be announced in March, assuming May says the UK is leaving the single market.

They said: “With the publication of our paper (Scotland’s Place in Europe) the ball is very much in May’s court.

“We’ve made clear we are intent on maintaining Scotland’s place in the single market – the paper makes clear that could be done in a UK context, so it is up to the UK Government to show it is willing to take those Scottish-specific proposals on board as part of the overall UK negotiating position re Article 50.”

Unclear

Any clearer? Me neither.

The Scottish Government has not found a reason why Theresa May should treat Scotland as sovereign on the matter of single market membership. So what possible motive should May have to be “willing to take those proposals on board”?

The fact of that matter is that the only person standing on this court is Nicola, holding a referendum ball and not willing to bounce it. The Scottish Government has come up with no compelling reason for May to play along, balls or not.

The only legal path Scotland has to being in the single market if May decides to pull the UK out is to become an independent country and then negotiate back in.

May leads a sovereign government responding to a national vote to leave the EU. She has no compelling reason to cut a deal for Scotland, which rejected becoming sovereign in 2014, nor any reason to fear another indy referendum.

The SNP has made it clear there will be no new vote unless there is a good chance of winning and those circumstances haven’t occurred, so the “threat” is really balls.

What is upsetting about this for nationalists is that independence has become a threat in the first place.

Scotland’s opportunity to govern itself is about Scots making the best of Scotland, reliant on our wits and resources. It isn’t meant as an act of vandalism to the UK. Yet the SNP leadership now only speak of it as a device to push or punish Westminster.

Irrelevance

The total absence of new arguments for independence is striking by its sheer irrelevance to Nicola’s strategy.

Her calm leadership has delivered no better case for independence and has reduced sovereignty to a threat – and a hollow one at that.

You have to hope this isn’t Sturgeon’s strategy but a piece of terrible advice she has been foolish to enough to follow and will recover her senses soon.

Quite what she says for the rest of the year is anybody’s guess. What she can’t say without inviting ridicule is another version of “you do that and I’ll hold another referendum”.

On consideration, this tale of the ball that didn’t bounce is quite depressing.