Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Indyref2? — Please, no return to intimidation

Former Scottish Labour leader Jim Murphy facing down hecklers in Dundee during the independence referendum campaign.
Former Scottish Labour leader Jim Murphy facing down hecklers in Dundee during the independence referendum campaign.

When Scotland’s lone Tory MP said the UK government was not afraid of holding a second independence referendum, it was easy for the Nationalists to mock.

David Mundell, the Scottish Secretary, was engaging in damage limitation, after one of his cabinet colleagues in London suggested Westminster would block a new ballot.

When the Secretary of State for Defence, Michael Fallon, refused to repeat that threat he became an easy target for the increasingly vituperative Nicola Sturgeon.

The UK government “was running a wee bit feart” of a fresh vote on separation, she taunted, scoring what is these days quite a rare point for her side.

Daft remark

It was a daft remark from Fallon, given the political climate in Scotland right now but how was he to know that, stuck in his Whitehall department?

Mundell, though, would surely have winced at so clumsy an intervention from the south, providing ready ammunition for the Nationalists, who having made a complete hash of their Brexit strategy, need every help they can get from Westminster.

Mundell hastened to recoup lost ground, saying during an interview on BBC Scotland’s Sunday Politics that he wasn’t scared of another referendum because he was confident the Unionists would win.

https://www.thecourier.co.uk/fp/news/politics/scottish-politics/365652/exclusive-uk-government-preparing-nicola-sturgeon-demand-indyref2/

What did worry him, however, was the prospect of Scotland tearing itself apart all over again.

“I dread it because I think it would be a divisive and seriously unpleasant event which would set Scot against Scot and I don’t think people want to see that,” he said.

He is quite right that people don’t want to turn the clock back. Recent polls have confirmed that, with even former Yes voters now reluctant to be dragged into combat once more.

In fact, only 27% of Scots now want a new vote on the constitution, with 51% against holding a referendum within the next few years, according to the latest polling.

It is hard to believe how selective memories are from just over two years ago but those who would have us redraw the battle lines don’t remember it as I do.

Kevin Pringle, right hand man to Alex Salmond in 2014, wrote the other day that both camps had behaved badly in the bitter lead-up to that “once in a generation” decision.

The narrative from the secessionists is usually even more fictionalised than this.

From their perspective, the indyref represented an outpouring of joyfulness. It was a very long party that politicised thousands of previously apathetic Scots and brought people together in a common cause.

It did do that but only if you found yourself in the Yes camp. Those of us who rejected constitutional upheaval had a different experience of 2014.

Two weeks before the vote, Jim Murphy, soon to become Scottish Labour leader, resumed his tour of Scottish cities, taking the Better Together message to voters from his platform of Irn-Bru crates.

He had embarked, if you recall, on 100 towns in 100 days but had been forced to call a temporary halt after the “heckling” he had been subjected to got out of hand.

The SNP may deny now what happened back then but there were plenty of witnesses. One Courier reader (whom I quoted at the time), said he had “watched in horror as the Yes supporting bullies harassed and abused” Murphy.

The organised intimidation by elements – by no means all – of the Yes campaign left a pall over Scotland.

There was an undercurrent of intolerance that accompanied what many in the Yes movement still insist was a positive energising of the grassroots.

Two years ago, Better Together billboards, from Perth to Dundee, were defaced and destroyed, while Yes ones remained intact. No voters, as canvassers recorded, worried that their windows would be smashed in if they put up posters.

Without even mentioning the online sniping of the militant cybernats, the referendum Scotland endured was an ugly episode in this country’s history. Mundell’s “unpleasant” is putting it rather mildly.

Relief

When Salmond was defeated, there was relief rather than glee on the Unionist side. We had seen how the Nationalists treated people who disagreed with them and we feared for Scotland’s future if they had won a free rein.

Fortunately, common sense prevailed and a clear majority of the electorate opted out of a separatist dystopia.

Of course we do not want a repeat of that sorry chapter. But now it appears that many, once eager, Nationalists are also reluctant to revisit the recent past.

Scotland gained nothing from September 2014 and lost much. If the SNP fought that contest ruthlessly, imagine how they would approach a second referendum, when they have even more at stake.

Nationalist cheerleaders might think any fight is worth having and the end justifies the means but Scotland’s heart just isn’t in it this time round.