Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

JENNY HJUL: Time to take the politics out of our healthcare

Shona Robison with NHS Tayside chief executive Lesley McLay and Professor John Connell, chairman of the Tayside NHS Board. (library photo)
Shona Robison with NHS Tayside chief executive Lesley McLay and Professor John Connell, chairman of the Tayside NHS Board. (library photo)

The latest news of an NHS staffing crisis and the suspension or closure of services and wards, revealed on Monday, is almost too familiar to cause much of a political stir.

This time it is the children’s ward at the Royal Alexandra Hospital in Paisley that is under threat, along with Inverclyde Hospital. Once again, the shortage of doctors, nurses and other health professionals is being blamed.

Just a week ago it was NHS Tayside making the headlines as Crieff Community Hospital in Perthshire was forced to turn away patients.

The health board there said “unplanned staff absences” meant it could not run the minor injury and illness unit safely.

In March, the same health board delayed operations at Perth Royal Infirmary due to a nursing shortage.

These are by no means isolated incidents in Tayside, which happens to be the Scottish health secretary’s own constituency.

Mess

If Shona Robison cannot oversee the smooth functioning of her local NHS it is no wonder she is making a mess of the whole country’s health provision.

Before she took on the portfolio, the most difficult in government, it belonged to Nicola Sturgeon. They will both be quick to defend their records; indeed, as soon as the new staffing problems were revealed, the Scottish Government passed the buck to individual heath boards.

Spending, they say, is at an all-time high and it is up to each board how it allocates funds.

On another day, ministers will argue NHS cuts have been imposed as a result of decisions taken at Westminster but Scotland must not shirk its role in this debacle.

Health has long been a devolved matter, even before devolution in fact, and the SNP has had 10 years in power to address issues such as recruitment and training.

It is hard to see, for example, how it can square the desperate situation in some hospitals, where there are not enough nurses to look after sick people, with the millions of pounds paid out in bonuses to consultants.

On the same day it came to light that NHS Tayside was abandoning patients in Perthshire, there were fresh revelations about senior medics’ pay packages. Some £43 million was dished out to 3,000 top doctors, up 15% on last year, despite their already generous remuneration and despite the NHS being so cash-strapped.

Sturgeon had promised when she was in charge of health to end the bonus culture but now her ministers just say they are offering doctors the “going rate”.

The current government must confront its failings but health is a department that seems to be beyond any form of political leadership.

The only possible solution, then, is to adopt a cross-party approach and to take politics out of the equation altogether.

Imagine a health service run purely for the benefit of those using it and not for politicians to score points before elections.

A politically neutral board could be established, manned mainly by health professionals who understand the true cost of health provision, with autonomy over the government of the day.

Resources would be allocated according to demand, rather than depending on how marginal a seat was and manpower shortages addressed with an overhaul of training that did not have to compete with other ministers and other departments.

If this sounds a little utopian that is because it is. The health service, more than any other government responsibility, affects every voter and is therefore the most emotive of electoral issues.

It has been used as a campaign weapon by all politicians in all elections – remember Sturgeon promising to keep open Monklands Hospital, earmarked for a merger, back in 2007.

And in the later stages of the 2014 independence referendum the Nationalists seized on health to try to curry favour with undecided voters. If they didn’t win the plebiscite, they warned, Scotland’s NHS would be privatised by London.

Lie

The claim was a lie, of course, as borne out in the three years since the No vote, with the continued devolution of the Scottish health system.

The SNP, defending its performance in the face of the recent indefensible chaos, managed to politicise the problem again.

They would, they said, increase funding “unlike Labour’s plan for NHS investment at the last Scottish election that was worse than even the Tories”.

Every party is at it, though, boasting that it alone can save the NHS. It was the Scottish Labour Party that exposed this week’s possible ward closures, more one suspects to highlight “a decade of SNP mismanagement” than to discover a lasting remedy.

With an ageing population, this is a dilemma that is not going to go away. It may seem a naive hope to think partisan factions could ever call a political truce but it is the only hope.