Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

How could anyone confuse to, too and two?

Post Thumbnail

I freely admit some of what I’m about to claim is biased, or even just my imagination.

I think there are aspects of personality that are common among people who have a respect for proper English usage.

These are intelligent people, of course. But there are other shared traits.

I believe people who value good grammar and proper punctuation have a well-defined sense of order. We like neat things. We like things to be organised. We are punctual. We are tidy. We take care. We take a pride in what we do. We value fairness.

More than most (although all Britain shares this) we respect the concept of queues, and feel a deep outrage if we suspect someone has “jumped”.

We have a fascination with stationery. All those pens, pencils, paper clips, notebooks (lined, of course) and post-it notes appeal to us as “useful”.

We have good table manners. We are disgusted by people who spit in the street. We admire hand-polished shoes and hold pens between finger and thumb, as we were taught, with the shaft of the pen pointing along our arm.

Now, there is no kind way to say this, but those who improperly use “there”, “they’re” and “their” are not the previously described type of person. Even worse are those who confuse “to”, “too” and (almost unbelievably) “two”.

This might sound like intellectual snobbery, and perhaps it is. But I am perplexed that anyone could write, “Their in agreement that there going to read the works of Solzhenitsyn, to”.

Unless there are other mitigating circumstances, how could anyone make it through primary and secondary schooling and not know the difference between “to” and “too”?

And even if the only literature you read is on the back of breakfast cereal boxes, you wouldn’t count “one, too, three”.

Why are such mistakes made? Is it the education system? Is it the fault of predictive text software when people type on phones or pads? But then, these devices have spellcheckers, don’t they?

Anyone could be forgiven for writing miniscule when they mean minuscule, or for having to consult a dictionary to ascertain the order of “s” and “ch” in fuchsia. But if you mix up “to” and “too” then you have little defence if people think you’re two stupid for words.

As for me, I wouldn’t pick you too be on my team in a quiz.

 


 

Word of the week

Rescarciate (verb)

To mend, or to make amends. I have no wish to rescarciate my relationship with those who confuse to, too and two.


Read the latest Oh my word! every Saturday in The Courier. Contact me at sfinan@dctmedia.co.uk