Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

EVE MUIRHEAD: The time isn’t right for female British footballers to earn the same as men

Stephanie Frappart during the Super Cup match.
Stephanie Frappart during the Super Cup match.

The analysis of the first ever female officials to take charge of a major men’s football final has been really positive.

People will have different views about whether Stephanie Frappart and her assistants should have been chosen for the Super Cup final and there was serious pressure on them.

The physical aspect of keeping up with the pace of a top level men’s game seemed to be the biggest concern but that didn’t prove to be an issue over 120 minutes in hot and humid conditions.

There was one controversial penalty decision but the decision she made was completely understandable and any criticism seems to be over VAR not over-ruling it after seeing different angles.

Hopefully the fact that they didn’t want to undermine her on such a significant occasion didn’t come into the VAR team’s thinking, but we’ll never know.

The fact that they officiated so well should open more doors in the future. There is absolutely no reason why men and women referees shouldn’t be treated the same if they’re good enough.

Talking of being treated the same, the issue of equal pay was back in the headlines this week when Frank de Boer described it as “ridiculous” in football.

My take on it has always been that the financial rewards in any sport have to be earned.

In tennis, for example, you can see why it should be a level playing field because there are huge stars like Serena Williams who drive big TV audiences and sponsorship.

In my own sport, the pay is equal at the grand slam events and that’s fair because the TV ratings are the same – and I was even told that they can be bigger for the women’s events.

Golf? The difference in profile is huge and that’s why there is a big gulf.

Football is a bit more complex. In America the women’s team is arguably more popular than the men’s so that’s a strong argument for equal pay.

Elsewhere, though? I don’t think we’ve reached that stage.

 

* We’re getting closer to the start of our season and will play a game or two at the national curling centre to help get us ready for our three-week trip to Canada at the end of the month.

It certainly won’t do us any harm.

It’s a bit different to the rugby teams playing games ahead of their World Cup, though.

Rugby isn’t the sort of game you can play half-hearted.

If you don’t go full throttle you’re more likely to get injured.

Add into the mix that a lot of players won’t be certain of being included in the squad going to Japan and they’ve got no option but to give everything.

For the unlucky few, though, it will mean getting injured at the worst possible time.

 

* When I went to the women’s Scottish Open last week to watch my friend Kelsey MacDonald play there was a lot of chat about who Catriona Matthew would pick for her Solheim Cup wildcards.

The consensus seemed to be that her options were pretty thin.

That will be why Catriona has taken the gamble of choosing Suzann Pettersen, who has played just two events in a year.

It highlights the size of the task in beating America at Gleneagles next month.