Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Exams 2021: Formal tests detrimental to schoolchildren says SQA probe professor

formal tests
Anxious Teenage Student Sitting Examination In School Hall; Shutterstock ID 774167659

Formal tests for pupils whose exams have been cancelled will be detrimental to them and their teachers, an education expert has warned.

Professor Mark Priestley, who led the probe into this year’s results fiasco, said assessment guidance from the Scottish Qualifications had resulted in schools turning to formal tests.

When he recommended validated assessments for National 5s in his review, he said, “we most certainly did not have in mind a series of externally set but internally assessed pencil and paper tests.”

‘Inevitable’ exams off

This week’s cancellation of 2021 Higher and Advanced Higher exams, following cancellation of National 5 exams in October, was inevitable, he said.

Writing in his blog with fellow Stirling University academic Dr Marina Shapira, he said: “The emerging practices based around formal tests will have detrimental effects: on the workload of the teachers who will end up assessing these additional tests, when study leave no longer exists to free up time; and on the students who will be tested to within an inch of their lives.

“Moreover, there are serious concerns about the validity of these tests; as SQA point out such tests have good predictive ability for exam performance, but one can seriously question their validity for assessing student achievement holistically.”

The emerging practices based around formal tests will have detrimental effects… on the students who will be tested to within an inch of their lives.”

Professor Mark Priestley and Dr Marina Shapira

Quoting Edinburgh University’s Professor Lindsay Paterson that “exams are being replaced by exams”, Prof Priestley said this has been made inevitable to some extent by guidance from the SQA.

The SQA, he said, sought to reduce teacher workload and account for missed study time by removing coursework which in turn reduced the evidence base for continuous assessment.

Prof Priestley made a series of recommendations in his review of this year’s SQA moderation process which saw more than 124,000 downgraded results awarded in August to pupils whose May exams were cancelled revoked.

They included suspension of the National 5 exams next year with awards based on estimates from validated assessments.

SQA response

An SQA spokesman said  that since National 5 exams were cancelled the SQA had chaired the 2021 National Qualifications Group in co-creating an alternative certification model.

He said: “The details of that model were announced by the group earlier this week. Further details will be provided for Higher and Advanced Higher shortly.

“We are asking teachers to assess learning and to report on this against the current criteria as defined in the course specifications for each subject.

“There is more flexibility in the generation of evidence within the classroom-based setting.

“However, teachers and lecturers appreciate that the assessment approach, for this exceptional year, is one that is familiar to them and this will help ensure that national standards can be consistently applied.”

Exams weakness

Prof Priestley also said the pandemic has exposed Scottish education’s reliance on exams as a weakness and the opportunity should be grasped to reconsider how schoolchildren are assessed.

Education Secretary John Swinney has already asked the OECD to consider the role of exams in its review of the Curriculum for Excellence.

While some see exams as the gold standard of assessment, Prof Priestley said critics of the system argue they are neither a valid nor reliable assessment tool, and extraneous circumstances could affect performance with possible “life-long consequences” for those sitting them.

He said: “The forthcoming OECD review provides a further opportunity to rethink the way we conduct high-stakes assessment.”