Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Tayside doctor allowed to return to work after suspension for ‘repeated dishonesty’

Dr Whittaker was a trainee doctor at PRI. Image: Steve MacDougall/DC Thomson.
Dr Whittaker was a trainee doctor at PRI. Image: Steve MacDougall/DC Thomson.

A Tayside doctor has been allowed to return to work after previously being suspended for ‘repeated dishonesty’ while working in Perth.

Dr Megan Whittaker was found in April, by The Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS), to have committed serious misconduct during the incidents in 2019.

These included Dr Whittaker lying to superiors by saying she had attended a conference when she had not, and taking actions that could have swayed the outcome of a performance review.

At the time, she was practising as a trainee in trauma and orthopaedics at Perth Royal Infirmary (PRI).

At the hearing in April, Dr Whittaker was given a six month suspension, which will end on November 18, when she will be allowed to return to work.

Misconduct

In April it was found Dr Whittaker submitted a study leave application to attend a conference in July 2019.

She failed to notify the relevant people she did not attend it when she knew she should have informed them.

In August 2019, she started a new rotation at Perth Royal Infirmary. That December, at a competence progression meeting, Dr Whittaker stated, on one or more occasions, she had attended the event when she knew she had not.

Also in 2019, she was required to undergo Multi Source Feedback.

Dr Whittaker was suspended for six months in April. Image: Steve MacDougall / DC Thomson.

Dr Whittaker was told her educational supervisor was to select half her raters (those who would provide her feedback).

However, Dr Whittaker failed to follow this instruction and selected all raters herself.

The April tribunal determined Dr Whittaker’s actions were dishonest and her fitness to practise was impaired by reason of misconduct.

They said a six month suspension would sufficiently reflect the gravity of Dr Whittaker’s misconduct and send a clear signal to her, the profession and the wider public this was serious misconduct unbefitting of a registered doctor.

Return to practise

At the hearing this month, Dr Whittaker said, at the time the events occurred, she was new to the hospital and was the only trainee there.

She said she was new to Dundee and did not have good social support around her.

She stated that this level of support is much stronger now and her parents have moved from Tanzania to the Tayside region.

Dr Whittaker said if she was allowed back to practise, she wishes to prove to her colleagues she can be trusted and her past lapses in judgement will not be repeated.

The tribunal also heard Dr Whittaker had been completing a diving course during her suspension, which had given her transferable skills, assisted her in learning to trust others and learning to communicate in difficult or dangerous situations.

Dr Whittaker’s fitness to practise was found to be no longer impaired. Image: Steven Brown.

Based on testimonials given on Dr Whittaker’s behalf, as well as the doctor’s remorse and reflection of the situation, the tribunal concluded her fitness to practise is no longer impaired by reason of her misconduct.

Tribunal chair, Jayne Wheat said: “One of the reasons why the April 2022 tribunal imposed a six month period of suspension, was to give Dr Whittaker adequate time to reflect on her misconduct and develop greater insight.

“Dr Whittaker has at this point achieved that objective and has full insight into her dishonesty, including the reasons for it, its impact on the public and profession and how she would avoid a repetition in future.”

We approached NHS Tayside for comment.

Conversation