Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Care round-up: Kirkcaldy childminder fails to meet requirements and rare top marks for ‘outstanding’ Stirling care home

We take a look at the latest reports for care homes, nurseries and after-school clubs across Tayside, Fife and Stirling.

This week's care round-up, covering Tayside, Fife and Stirling
William Simpson's Care Home features in this week's round-up. Image: William Simpson's

A Kirkcaldy childminder has failed to meet requirements and a Stirling care home’s management has received a glowing report in the latest care inspections.

The Courier has taken a closer look at the most recent Care Inspectorate reports for Tayside, Fife and Stirling.

The organisation is the watchdog for the care industry and inspects providers such as care homes and childcare services to ensure they meet standards.

The watchdog grades services on key areas including wellbeing, leadership and staffing on a six-point scale where 1 is unsatisfactory and 6 is excellent.

Some reports were only published weeks after the inspections took place.

Lisa Ward, Kirkcaldy

Inspection date

  • January 13

Inspectors attended a follow-up review at the childminder’s flat after requesting for improvements to be made in November.

One of the improvements needed was to ensure the children’s care, development and learning needs were met by developing personal plans.

The plans must:

  • Set out how children’s needs will be met
  • Record how children have progressed
  • Be put in place within 28 days of a child starting at the service
  • Be reviewed every six months or more often if the child’s needs change
  • Be shared and updated with children, parents and carers

Inspectors found that the childminder made no progress in ensuring plans were in place and up to date.

The inspectors also advised Ward to ensure systems were in place for children to receive the correct medical treatment at the appropriate time.

They found that no progress was made, potentially putting children at risk.

Finally, Ward was asked to ensure children had access to resources and toys appropriate for their age and stage of development.

Inspectors discovered there was limited use of ‘open-ended, natural’ play resources to promote curiosity and enquiry indoors.

Inspectors ruled that this reduced opportunities to develop the children’s creative potential.

Lisa Ward has been given until March 31 to make the improvements set out by inspectors.

William Simpson’s Care Home, Stirling

William Simpson’s Care Home. Image: William Simpson’s

Previous ratings

  • Wellbeing – 5
  • Leadership – 6
  • Staff – 5

New ratings

  • Wellbeing – 5
  • Leadership – 6
  • Staff – 5

Inspection date

  • January 17

The Stirling care home received the highest mark possible for the management’s leadership qualities.

Inspectors felt the management and leadership team were ‘highly motivated and effective’.

The staff prioritise their focus on the people living in the home, and how things could be continuously improved for them.

Inspectors claim this is a ‘striking, much improved’ contrast to how things had been in previous years.

Staff received role modelling training engagement and took part in improvement projects that involved living in the home.

Staff had been encouraged and supported to make the home a better place for everyone.

The employees felt that they were listened to and valued by the management.

Career progression opportunities have been made available to staff and support was given to help those flourish in their roles.

There was a culture of continuous learning and development that was fully embedded across the service.

Randolph Hill Nursing Home, Dunblane

Randolph Hill Nursing Home. Image: Randolph Hill

Previous ratings

  • Wellbeing – 5
  • Staff – 5

New ratings

  • Wellbeing – 5
  • Staff – 5

Inspection date

  • February 13

The Dunblane nursing home also received high marks from inspectors.

They found that interactions between staff and those in care were ‘kind and respectful’, and employees were genuinely fond of people and knew them well.

One person said: “There is nothing I would like to change about my care
in Randolph Hill.

“I always receive a fantastic quality of service with full dignity and respect.”

Safe systems have been put in place to oversee when support with medication is needed.

Supplementary charts are kept up to date throughout the day and people regularly receive their medication when needed.

Many staff had been employed in the service for a long time, because of this, staff knew each other well and had developed good working relationships.

People benefitted from this because the staff worked well together.

Netherton Farm, Auchterarder

Previous ratings

  • Wellbeing – 2

New ratings

  • Wellbeing – 2

Inspection date

  • January 21

The Auchterarder care home was given a ‘weak’ evaluation from inspectors.

They felt that the safety of the young people was at times ‘compromised’.

It was discovered that some had left the home without staff being aware.

Youngsters were also found to be keeping their own lighters and tobacco, as well as smoking cannabis.

The lack of a manager at the house increased the safety risk of the young people and the staff.

No advocacy workers visited the house, limited the young people’s access to social services.

The inspectors felt this was a barrier to the young people’s rights being fully considered.

There was also limited evidence of young people being actively involved in making choices about their care and support needs.

Inspectors also found that plans and risk assessments were not up-to-date and were static rather than dynamic.

Other recent reports published by the Care Inspectorate are listed below (clicking will download a PDF):

You can find previous care round-ups on the Care Inspectorate section of our website.

Conversation