Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Monifieth couple ‘£1k out of pocket’ after Emirates flight chaos slam ‘disgraceful’ compensation offer

Margaret McArthur, 74, and husband Derek, 76, also claim they suffered 'inhumane' conditions.

Margaret and Derek McArthur.
Margaret and Derek McArthur are trying to claim over £1,000 in compensation from Emirates. Image: Mhairi Edwards/DC Thomson

A Monifieth couple has slammed Emirates after being offered a ‘disgraceful’ amount in compensation for cancelled flights and lost luggage.

Margaret McArthur, 74, and her husband Derek, 76, claim they were forced to fork out more than £1,000 after a holiday of a lifetime was impacted by severe flooding in Dubai in April.

Hundreds of flights at the world’s second-busiest airport were disrupted, with Margaret claiming their trip almost descended into a “riot” as thousands of passengers waited for up to 30 hours in the terminal in “inhumane” conditions.

Margaret says she does not want to fly with Emirates again. Image: Mhairi Edwards/DC Thomson

Margaret and Derek were en route to Tokyo for a cruise when their connecting flight from the UAE was cancelled, leaving them stranded in the airport.

They managed to catch another flight almost 24 hours later – but to another airport in Tokyo, without their luggage.

Despite promises from Emirates, it failed to arrive at their hotel the following day – meaning they had to board their 10-day cruise without it.

The pair were eventually reunited with their luggage around two weeks later, by which time they say they had spent more than £1,000 on new clothes, luggage and travel arrangements.

They were hoping to be fully recompensed by the airline, which is headquartered in Dubai.

However, six months on from their ordeal they claim to have been offered $300 – roughly £230.

The couple also received an apology, but say the ordeal has left them feeling “frustrated and irritated”.

‘I don’t think I’d like to fly Emirates again’

Margaret told The Courier: “It turned out about 60 other passengers on the cruise had the same problem.

“When we got home, we got in touch with Emirates who asked us to submit our receipts, which we scanned and spent a lot of time doing because they were in Japanese.

“We also had to make sure we didn’t include anything that wasn’t to do with the delay – I was very honest.

Flooded roads in Dubai.
Roads were left flooded in April following the extreme weather. Image: STRINGER/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock (14439129w)

“After we put in the claim, they got back to us saying they accept $300 which we don’t think is nearly enough.

“We’ve been in touch with others and it seems to be the same for them too.

“Some have been offered airmiles – I’m not interested in that as I don’t think I’d like to fly Emirates again.”

Emirates compensation offer branded ‘disgraceful’

Derek added: “I’m going to keep following them up.

“We will keep contacting them and they might suggest airmiles, but that’s only useful if we want to fly with them again.

“But I don’t think we’ll get offered any more than the $300.

“We ended up with 15kg extra weight and they tried to charge us excess baggage – we had to remind them of the flooding.

Margaret and Derek on their cruise.
Margaret and Derek on their cruise. Image: Supplied

“The flights themselves were good, but the communication when they hit trouble is very very poor.

“If they had bothered to read our claim, they should’ve realised the $300 was a disgraceful offer.”

Emirates did not respond to repeated requests for comment about Margaret and Derek’s experience.

At the time of the floods, the airline’s president Sir Tim Clark admitted “our response has been far from perfect”.

In an open letter, he said: “We acknowledge and understand the frustration of our customers due to the congestion, lack of information, and confusion in the terminals.

“We acknowledge that the long queues and wait times have been unacceptable.”

Conversation