Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Angus war hero call for tougher measures to weed out “pseudo charities” failing veterans

Grant Allen.
Grant Allen.

A former soldier has called for tougher measures to weed out “pseudo-charities” which could be failing veterans.

Grant Allen, who served with 7 (Sphinx) Battery Royal Artillery at RM Condor, said it was “deeply worrying” that some organisations were spending so little of their income on good causes.

People in Angus have raised concerns after receiving donation bags at home for a military charity which is being investigated by the Charity Commission.

Forces Support responded by saying it had “no agreement in place” with the textile company manufacturing the bags and anyone who gets a bag delivered to their door “should not give to this company” as they do not act on the charity’s behalf.

Mr Allen, who was wounded in combat and now raises money for Help for Heroes, said: “The number of organisations springing up with charitable status, but whose expenditure on good work is dwarfed by fundraising costs, staff salaries and shops is deeply worrying.

“I’d like to see a much tougher regime in place that weeds out what some might call pseudo-charities, because the fact is that some of these outfits can put people off from donating to the bona fide charities that make such a positive difference to service personnel, veterans and their families.”

The Charity Commission has issued a regulatory alert to 187 recently-registered military charities after a review found most had weaknesses in safeguarding and fundraising.

The regulator decided to review military charities after a number of media reports about aggressive fundraising techniques.

The review found there has been a “loss of trust in the charity sector as a whole, caused mainly by misconduct by trustees and management in a few”.

Councillor David Fairweather.

Arbroath Independent councillor David Fairweather said: “I was approached by a constituent who is an army veteran and had received several donation bags at home for a military charity.

“He was suspicious, and had decided to look into them further.”

Mr Fairweather said the man found that the organisation, Forces Support, was under investigation by the Charities Commission after it was revealed that just 15% of its 2015-16 income of £2.7 million was spent on charitable activities, while the chief executive enjoyed a 40% pay increase on the previous year.

“Although there is no suggestion of wrongdoing, many people, myself included, would question why so much is spent on fundraising, shops and salaries, and so little is making its way to helping the families of fallen troops,” he added.

“A £5 donation would see just 75p used to support those who need it.

“Angus has an outstanding military tradition, and of course people want to help, so I would urge those considering making a donation to check the charity before doing so.

“There are some excellent organisations doing amazing work such as Help for Heroes, Royal British Legion, PoppyScotland and the Royal Marines Association to name just a few, whose finances are completely transparent, and their projects make a real difference.

“I think this is especially important as we approach Armistice Day, and prepare to honour those who made the ultimate sacrifice in combat zones across the world.”

Forces Support which has outlets in Scotland has been under investigation over its expenditure.

The Charity Commission acted following a complaint from a war veteran that most of the money it raised was spent on running dozens of shops and employing staff.

No evidence of any wrongdoing has been found. However, according to its latest accounts, FSL had an  income of £2.7m in 2015-16 and spent £2.5m. Only 15% of the expenditure went on “charitable activities” — a total of £375,308 — with £2.12m spent on fundraising.

Over the same period, Bill McCance, the charity’s chief executive, was paid £71,400, an increase of almost 40% compared with his remuneration in 2014-15.