Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Hard-hitting report casts doubt over planned Arbroath retail park

A 3D image of the proposed retail park.
A 3D image of the proposed retail park.

A hard-hitting new report could sound the death knell for an £11 million Angus retail development.

Consultants Scott Hobbs Planning – brought in by Angus Council to probe the application – said the proposed development could have “significant, structural, long term consequences for the future of the town centre as a retail destination”.

The Edinburgh-based company was ordered to review Brackenbrae Investment Ltd’s initial retail statement following claims it produced “inconsistent results”.

A 3D image of the proposed retail park.

The survey suggested Arbroath town centre shops were “over-trading” by more than 20% which critics suggested was at odds with the number of empty properties.

Lidl, Asda and Co-op have all raised objections to the proposal at the site of the former Metal Box factory, which would be occupied by Aldi, B&M Home Stores and Iceland’s new Food Warehouse store.

Talks have also been ongoing with Burger King and Costa Coffee to fill other units on the land which latterly housed the Presentation Products factory.

The Scott Hobbs Planning report stated: “The conclusions reached in this report lead to the overall conclusion that the impact on the vitality and viability of Arbroath town centre arising from the proposed development is understated in the retail statement and is likely to be significantly higher.

“The retail statement calculates an overall impact on the town centre of 6% (5% impact on comparison goods turnover and 10% impact on convenience goods turnover).

“Even at these levels the town centre comparison trade (which is the significant majority) is achieving just over 75% of what it is expected to achieve.

“Even a cursory visit to the main streets which make up the town centre, and the Abbeygate Centre, quickly leads to the conclusion that the centre is vulnerable to competition from out of centre retail which should, according to policy, in the first instance be located in the town centre.

“A significant increase in the predicted impact, coupled with the highly flexible format and floorspace ranges which could be facilitated in the proposed development, could have significant, structural, long term consequences for the future of the town centre as a retail destination.”

Jigsaw Planning, on behalf of objector Asda, said the review confirmed there are “significant concerns that the impact on the vitality and viability of Arbroath Town Centre has been understated in the retail statement and that the impact is actually likely to be significantly higher”.

Director Katherine Sneeden said: “As such Asda maintains its position that the council should refuse this application.

“The impact that this proposal will have on the town centre is significant in relative terms given the total quantum of retail and the potential for town centre tenants to relocate.”

Co-op also said the report reaffirmed its view that the application would have a significant adverse effect on Arbroath and Carnoustie town centres.

Brackenbrae Investments Ltd stuck to its guns and said its proposal could result in “increased expenditure retention within the town centre, via the new linked trips that would be generated by the development and the retention of more shoppers within the catchment”.

It said the “original sequential assessment” was “robust and fully assesses locations with the potential to accommodate the overall development proposal”.

However, it said that if Angus Council still has concerns regarding the scale and nature of the development proposals, it would consider “entering into dialogue to agree appropriately worded conditions to address these matters”.

Angus Council plans to make a decision by August at the latest.