Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Stay on the straight and narrow — Wedding venue in Fife loses access road appeal

Ian and Ruth Macallan, Carphin House
The Macallans have lost their appeal over the road access

The owners of a historic Fife mansion, who were ordered to stop hosting weddings because of misbehaving guests, have lost a second legal battle over use of a single track road.

Lawyers acting for Ian and Ruth Macallan appealed to reverse a previous decision after the couple took farmer Ian Arbuckle to court.

Mr Arbuckle owns a farm beside the Macallans’ 18th century Carphin House.

The Macallans, of Luthrie, near Cupar, wanted an order which would allow them to use passing places and verges on a single track road, which they use to get to the property.

They also wanted an order which would prevent the Arbuckles – who own the land –  from “obstructing” the passing places and verges.

The parties live on properties which once formed part of the Carphin Estate.

Ruth and Ian Macallan have faced major opposition over their use of Carphin House.

In 2016, previous owner Tobin Wemyss subdivided the estate up and sold the mansion house to the Macallans.

The Arbuckles purchased their farm soon after.

Judgement issued

The proceedings between the two parties focused on legal agreements which were drawn up following the sales.

A sheriff concluded the Macallans have “no right” to use the passing places and verges and are only legally entitled to use the road itself.

The sheriff refused to allow the case to go to proof – a civil trial.

This prompted lawyers acting for the Macallans to go to the Sheriff Appeal Court in Edinburgh to try to reverse the decision.

However, Sheriff Principal Marysia Lewis, Sheriff Fiona Tait and Sheriff Thomas McCartney upheld the previous decision.

In a written judgement, Sheriff Principal Lewis concluded their colleague had not misinterpreted the law.

We do not accept… a right to move onto a passing place or onto the verges which lie out with the burdened area to allow other vehicles to pass is necessary” – Sheriff Principal Marysia Lewis

She wrote: “The appellants maintain that the ancillary right is to have vehicular access to the Mansion House: not simply the right to use the access road.

“That is not what they acquired through the grant.

“We acknowledge that a vehicle which cannot make progress along the roadway in face of oncoming traffic because it must reverse all the way back to the start instead of back only to the most recent passing place is inconvenienced – and no doubt sometimes significantly so – but we do not accept… a right to move onto a passing place or onto the verges which lie out with the burdened area to allow other vehicles to pass is necessary for the comfortable use and enjoyment of the servitude.

“For the foregoing reasons, we do not find favour with the submission that the sheriff erred in refusing to appoint a proof before answer.”

Ongoing dispute over venue

In January 2019, the Macallans were ordered to stop hosting weddings after complaints about guests spewing and urinating in public.

Residents complained about parties being held at the 18th century property.

The Macallans used the house to host weddings in the grounds and claimed the business would create jobs and generate revenue for the local economy.

However, horrified residents in the village said rowdy wedding revellers were making their lives a misery with some even complaining about drunken female wedding guests urinating in public areas.

The Macallans maintain they have not been treated fairly throughout the lengthy saga.