Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Dundee sheriff dismisses evidence from ‘paedophile catchers’ as ‘fraud’

Sheriff Alastair Brown warned sex offenders.
Sheriff Alastair Brown warned sex offenders.

A Dundee judge has blasted self-styled “paedophile catchers” who travelled to the city to confront a man they believed to be a child predator.

Sheriff Alastair Brown ruled evidence gathered by the vigilante group in the case of Paul Potelle was inadmissible and amounted to fraud.

He said the group had not acted in good faith and its actions had been “unlawful at all stages”.

Potelle, 47, had been charged with sending indecent social media messages to what he believed to be a 13-year-old girl and a child under 13, between May 22 and August 22, 2017.

The recipients of the messages were, in fact, adults who posed as children online.

They then travelled to Dundee to confront Potelle, who had to be taken into custody for his own protection, Dundee Sheriff Court heard.

Sheriff Brown warned undercover work should be left to the police, but dismissed a defence argument stating that  to use evidence from “paedophile catchers” would amount to a contravention of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human rights, which relates to privacy.


>> Keep up to date with the latest news with The Courier newsletter


Sheriff Brown said: “I have reached the conclusion that the schemes operated were unlawful at all stages, and therefore the evidence is inadmissible.

“Put simply, what they did was fraud. They made a false pretence about themselves. They were knowingly dishonest in order to bring about a particular result.

“They then set out to induce him (Potelle) to continue to engage with messaging and to conduct himself in a way that would lead to a prison sentence.

“Their conduct in the exchange was calculating and manipulative. They then travelled to Dundee to confront Mr Potelle and he had to be taken to custody for his own protection.

“I have rejected the position that what was done, was done in good faith.”

Sheriff Brown said that he believed  “personal gratification” was a “significant motivator” for the actions of one of the individuals posing as a “decoy”.

The sheriff added: “Internet crime is a serious issue, though it’s far more complex than they appear to recognise.

“Police Scotland do take it seriously but policing is a complex activity, which needs to be left to the police.

“They arrest them in a way that does not cause public disorder. They do not post photos of suspects on the internet.”

Sheriff Brown explained that Potelle was not guilty of indecent communications as he was communicating with adults who were consenting and even “hoping” for the communication.

The case has been continued until May 10 for the prosecution to decide whether they will appeal the ruling.

Potelle’s attendance has been excused.