Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

‘Back of the net’ says worker after his sentence for stealing £1m from Dundee council is halved

Mark Conway, left, and a William Hill shop, right.
Mark Conway, left, and a William Hill shop, right.

A council worker who stole £1.06 million from his employers to settle gambling debts has won a bid to have his prison sentence cut.

Financial computing specialist Mark Conway, 55, diverted public money to his own accounts after losing cash betting online with the bookmaker William Hill.

He defrauded Dundee City Council of £1,065,085 during his crime spree before he was caught in 2016.

He was given a sentence of five years and four months in August the following year.

However, the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) sent the case to the Court of Criminal Appeal in Edinburgh.

Lawyers at the legal watchdog concluded that Conway may have suffered a miscarriage of justice.

The SCCRC concluded that judge Graeme Buchanan QC did not know that Dundee City Council had recovered the stolen cash from its insurers and from William Hill.

The commission believed that had judge Buchanan known this, he may have given Conway a shorter custodial term.

The commission also believed that offenders who had been convicted in similar circumstances had been given shorter sentences.

Appeal judges Lord Carloway, Lord Menzies and Lord Turnbull agreed that the sentence imposed on Conway was too harsh when compared to terms given to people convicted of similar offences.

In a judgment published by the court yesterday, the court reduced Conway’s sentence to four years.

Lord Turnbull, who gave the judgment, wrote: “Despite the limitations of the information available, the picture which emerges… is that the sentence selected in his case stands out as being high.

“The sentence imposed shall be quashed and in its place there shall be substituted a sentence of four years.”

Conway, formerly of Brechin, made entries in the council’s computer system pretending to represent sums due to genuine suppliers.

Suspicions were aroused when an employee noted payment to a building firm had been sent to a Nationwide building society account.

The judgment tells of how Dundee City Council recovered £335,923 from its insurers. The local authority also took £258,966 from Conway’s pension pot.

The judgment also reveals how in March 2018, the Gambling Commission carried out an investigation into Conway’s relationship with William Hill.

The probe concluded that there had been “systemic failings” with William Hill’s money laundering policies and how to limit harm to problem gamblers.

The commission ordered William Hill to pay Dundee City Council £500,000.

 

‘Back of the net’ blog reveals Conway’s fight on his terms

Convicted fraudster Mark Conway has spoken of the “cathartic” experience of representing himself in the High Court.

In a blog published on the Scottish Legal News website, Conway described his experiences as a party litigant – the term for someone who represents themselves in a Scots court.

He said: “When I fell into the world of addiction-fuelled criminality I did so as a naive layman in respect of all things legal.”

He believed the benefit of an early plea in case was diminished by what Conway branded an “excessive starting point” for sentencing.

Conway describes the judicial process as leaving him feeling “undervalued and under-represented”, prompting the decision to take party litigant status.

And he resisted repeated advice to seek legal representation to pursue the appeal.

“My determination not to do so was occasionally tested, mainly through fear of the unknown and a lack of published information on what exactly to expect, but it is with some degree of pride that I did not cave in to the weight of opinion,” he added.

“I genuinely found myself imbued with a determination to have my voice finally heard.

“For me the issue became less one of consequences than the power to claim self-advocacy. If I failed then at least I would have done so on my own terms.”

Conway revealed he sat at his kitchen table for the virtual hearing, “my silk boxers hidden from view.”

“Finally after three years of involvement in the criminal justice and judicial systems (I) had the chance to say exactly what I wanted to say, how I wanted to say it, and with no filtering caused by having my words read out by ‘actors’.

“As for the outcome, well, to couch it in terms which I am glad to say no longer have relevancy to my addiction-free life… get in, back of the net.”