Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Sale of A90 ‘ransom strip’ may be forced through to protect safety of motorists

A past accident on the Swallow Roundabout
A past accident on the Swallow Roundabout

The sale of a ransom strip of land blocking crucial safety upgrades on the A90 may be forced through by Dundee City Council.

The Swallow Roundabout has been branded a serious safety risk as the Western Gateway development brings more traffic to the junction.

However, after two years of fruitless negotiations between housebuilders Springfield and a private landowner, the council is looking at ways to step in.

The local authority is assessing the “feasibility” of a compulsory purchase order (CPO) if the delay continues.

CPOs are used by councils and governments to obtain land or property without the consent of the owner.

Ransom strip

The land in question is a small strip to the north of the roundabout — part of Scotland’s busiest route to the north-east and the start of Dundee’s Kingsway bypass.

Such pieces of land are often dubbed “ransom strips” because although they are small and insignificant, they can be crucial in a wider construction project.

The aftermath of a crash on the A90 at the Swallow Roundabout in 2018

It is listed online as belonging to the “Residue of Invergowrie Estate = Trustees of Christopher Clayhills Henderson Lifevent Trust.”

The land is needed to expand on the existing road safety infrastructure at the roundabout.

A restriction imposed by the local authority states Springfield cannot sell more than 270 homes until it pays to upgrade it.

This is to guard against increased traffic coming from the new housing estate, which could eventually reach more than 1000 homes by 2025.

The firm has so far built 316 new properties, leading to accusations the developer is already in breach of planning conditions.

‘Very worrying for public safety’

Pamela Henderson, who is a trustee of the Christopher Clayhills Henderson Lifevent Trust, echoed this claim and says the trust is not asking for more than the land is worth.

She said: “We are aware that the upgrade of the Swallow Roundabout should have been finished by the time 270 houses were built and that more than 300 houses are now occupied.

“This is a major breach of the planning conditions, which were put in place to protect roads users.

“This is obviously very worrying for public safety and we have been anxious from the beginning not to cause any delays to these vital works.

“We have been endeavouring to come to an amicable solution for over two years but, unfortunately, Springfield Properties have not demonstrated the same sense of urgency.

“The Trust is willing to sell the land required to Springfield or the council at the earliest opportunity.”

She added: “To reiterate, we are willing sellers and there is no requirement to use compulsory purchase and public funds to assist a plc house builder avoid their obligations.”

The different valuations obtained by the trust and Springfield are not known.

It is understood the estimated cost to upgrade the roundabout would be over £4 million.

Housebuilders Springfield must buy a strip of private land, highlighted in red, before it is able to upgrade the Swallow Roundabout, pictured beneath. Courtesy Google Maps 2021

Springfield Central Managing Director, Peter Matthews, said the company is committed to improving the roundabout in partnership with the council.

He said: “We are hopeful that our discussions with the council and the third-party landowner over a small strip of land included in our approved designs will conclude soon.

“This would enable us to revisit our construction programme and organise to start on site.

“While traffic pressure on the roundabout (and across the city) has eased due to home working and recent lockdown restrictions, we’d like to reassure residents at Dykes of Gray that all parties are dedicated to ensuring that the roundabout upgrade can be delivered as quickly and safely as possible.

“This includes the extension of the footpath from the village to existing walking routes enhancing the accessibility of the village.”

A spokesperson for Dundee City Council said: “We are keen to see the upgrading of the Swallow roundabout as soon as possible and continue to encourage the landowner and developer to conclude their discussions that would allow the junction to be upgraded.

“The council has statutory powers of Compulsory Purchase which will be considered as an option in the event that a negotiated agreement cannot be reached.

“Enhancing walking and cycling routes in the Western Gateway and to the city are also important and the council will be undertaking further studies to support more active travel.”

What is Transport Scotland saying?

Transport Scotland is responsible for delivering the Scottish Government’s vision for transport.

It works to reduce accidents and fatalities on the country’s roads.

A spokesperson said: “The developer of the Western Gateway area, Springfield Developments, is currently limited by planning conditions in the number of houses that can be built before the improvements at Swallow roundabout are undertaken.

“This is set at 270 dwellings and is based on an assessment of the operation of the existing road network, including Swallow roundabout.

“The formal Minute of Agreement between Transport Scotland and Springfield Properties to allow works to proceed is not yet complete.

“We are awaiting a further submission from the developer.

“The completion of the works is a matter for the developer to promote and achieve in accordance with the requirements of planning conditions and the Minute of Agreement once concluded.

“The enforcement of planning conditions is a matter for the Council and, being a planning issue, it would be for the council to consider what action would be appropriate in the circumstances.”