Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

House builder warns Broughty Ferry decision will deter investment in Dundee

An impression of how the houses at Balgillo Heights might look.
An impression of how the houses at Balgillo Heights might look.

The decision to reject a proposal to build 150 new homes in Broughty Ferry will scare companies from investing in Dundee, it has been claimed.

In an unprecedented attack on Dundee City councillors, house builders Kirkwood Homes said the decision not to approve their plans for Balgillo Heights could drive investors from the city towards neighbouring local authorities instead.

Dundee City Council’s planning committee voted 12 to nine against the plans on Monday, despite officers recommending them for approval.

The site has been earmarked for development in the city’s new development plan due to come into effect in December, although it is still to be ratified by the Scottish Government.

Although committee convener Will Dawson put forward a motion to approve Kirkwood’s proposal, Conservative Broughty Ferry councillor Derek Scott’s amendment to refuse the plans won the vote.

Kirkwood Homes’ managing director Colin Crombie, said: “Dundee is quite rightly setting out ambitious growth targets as it looks to capitalise on the investment brought about by the V&A development.

“Unless elected members fully buy into this, Dundee will fail to attract further investment and it will fail to deliver new quality housing for the people of Dundee for which there is a clear demand – with over 550 registering an interest in our site alone.

“I challenge the councillors to show the development industry that they share a vision of growth for Dundee, a vision that puts new homes and economic benefit at its heart and doesn’t fall back onto to party politics and point scoring on the behalf of constituents, with councillors representing the whole of the community and not just the vocal minority who oppose any form of development or investment.

“The failure to grasp the opportunity that the V&A project has brought will result in adjoining local authorities benefiting from development and future job creation on the city boundaries, as is already evident in Monifieth.”

Mr Crombie said councillors had already endorsed developing the site when they gave their backing to its inclusion on the new Local Development Plan.

He claimed the decision ran contrary to a recent agreement between Dundee City Council and homes for Scotland over the need to build more new homes in Dundee.

Mr Scott’s amendment cited a number of concerns about the impact of the new houses on infrastructure in addition to the new Local Development Plan not yet being in place.

These included concerns about traffic and access to amenities such as primary schools and GP surgeries.

Mr Crombie said these issues had already been addressed when the local authority was agreeing the new Local Development Plan.

He said his company is likely to appeal the planning committee’s decision given the “strong recommendation for approval” presented by council officers.

Broughty Ferry Liberal Democrat councillor Craig Duncan, who seconded Mr Scott’s amendment, said the application had to be considered under the terms of the current Local Development Plan, rather than the one likely to come into force at the end of the year.

He said: “Local Authorities have planning rules and regulations for very good reasons. Allowing such a flagrant breach of the Local Development Plan in the absence of any compelling reason, would set a dangerous precedent.

“Approval would have sent the wrong message as any such application must meet the council’s standards and within a timeframe already set be the council and not before.

“Approval would have been tantamount to sanctioning the driving of a coach and horses through the councils own previously agreed policies”.