Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Plans to double size of St Andrews lodges holiday park thrown out

Plans that would effectively see the holiday park double in size have been rejected.
Plans that would effectively see the holiday park double in size have been rejected.

Operators of a popular holiday park near St Andrews hoping to effectively double its size have been thwarted after controversial plans to extend the site were refused.

St Andrews Forest Lodges Limited has failed to secure consent from Fife Council to create 18 new luxury holiday lodges just outside the hamlet of Kincaple.

There are currently 17 lodges on the site, but farmland to the north-east of the existing provision had been earmarked for the additional lodges, a reception and manager’s accommodation, and a biomass heating plant.

However, councillors on the north east Fife planning committee voted 8-4 to reject the application.

Kincaple residents had fought vigorously against the proposal, in particular its impact on the road infrastructure.

Kincaple residents Allan Burns and Carol Pickthall at the site where the holiday park extension was proposed.
Kincaple residents Allan Burns and Carol Pickthall at the site where the holiday park extension was proposed.

Sixty objections to the plans had been received by the local authority, including a representation from Strathkinness Community Council, citing concerns ranging from the loss of arable land and the impact on the environment to noise and drainage issues.

St Andrews Lib Dem councillor Jane-Ann Liston moved refusal on a number of grounds, suggesting the development’s scale and density was out of character with the area, would have an impact on the environment and infrastructure, and posed road safety issues.

The SNP’s David MacDiarmid and Ann Verner raised concerns about the loss of trees and road safety respectively, while Conservative councillor Andy Heer said the development would “overwhelm” the existing settlement of Kincaple.

Moves to approve plans voted down

“It seems to me there are going to be more homes here than houses in the actual village,” he noted, adding his fears that waste water systems would be unable to cope.

An amendment backing the application, lodged by Lib Dem councillor Bill Porteous and seconded by Conservative councillor Tony Miklinski, was ultimately voted down.

St Andrews Forest Lodges had said local producers and builders would be employed during the construction stages, while the extension would also create two full-time and two part-time jobs.

An image of how the extended site may have looked.
An image of how the extended site may have looked.

Ryan Day, property and portfolio manager at Hoseasons, which would have helped to market the accommodation, described the domestic lodge sector as “extremely buoyant” at present, and argued there is a huge demand in the St Andrews area.

He said: “The traditional season of Easter to the end of October is rapidly becoming a thing of the past and it is evident that more quality accommodation is coming into the market suitable for all-year round breaks, and in particular a huge increase in ‘holiday snacking’ of two, three and four-night breaks.

“This provides a superb boost for local tourism as visitors are now taking holidays at times of the year traditionally not as popular as the main summer holiday school weeks.”

Campaigner reacts to planning refusal

News of the refusal has been welcomed by those who campaigned against the plans.

Allan Burns, one of those opposed to the proposals, said: “It’s come as a great relief to the village and there’s an overwhelming feeling that common sense has prevailed.

“We are particularly appreciative of several of the local councillors for listening to our concerns, in particular Councillor Jane Ann Liston, who visited the village to see how the proposed park would adversely impact on the village.

“However, we are minded that the applicant may yet appeal the decision and therefore we will continue to monitor the situation.”