Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

BMW driver suing Fife Council over £2,500 pothole damage to car

Steven Clinton has accused the local authority of a "scandalous" waste of taxpayers' money by paying expensive lawyers to fight the bill in court.

Steven Clinton's car was badly damaged after he hit a pothole.
Steven Clinton's car was badly damaged after he hit a pothole. Image: Kenny Smith/DC Thomson.

A BMW driver is suing Fife Council over a £2,500 pothole damage claim.

Steven Clinton has accused the local authority of a “scandalous” waste of taxpayers’ money by paying expensive lawyers to fight the bill in court.

He claims his three-year-old car was extensively damaged after he hit the “unavoidable” pothole on March 11.

Steven Clinton with his BMW, which received £2,500 of repairs.
Steven Clinton with his BMW, which received £2,500 of repairs. Image: Kenny Smith/DC Thomson

His tyres “exploded” and alloys were damaged when the bottom of the vehicle struck the ground.

And he had to shell out a four-figure sum on repairs at a specialist BMW garage.

The incident happened on the A911 Lochgelly to Auchmuirbridge road.

Steven says the pothole was the same depth as an Irn Bru can but Fife Council is refusing to accept liability.

He added: “Fife Council has decided they would rather spend taxpayers’ money to fight me than fix the road or pay for the damage that’s been done.

“The cost of the lawyer probably exceeds the value of the claim I’m making.”

‘The pothole was unavoidable’

Steven is an Edinburgh-based IT specialist but also works as a gliding instructor at Portmoak Airfield at weekends.

He was travelling there in the dark when disaster struck.

“I was going at about 50mph in a 60mph zone and pulled out to overtake a slower vehicle,” he said.

The pothole at the centre of the Fife Council claim was the depth of an Irn Bru can.
The pothole was the depth of an Irn Bru can. Image: Supplied by Steven Clinton.

“The pothole was unavoidable. It went from the edge of the road to the middle of the lane.

“My tyres basically exploded and the pressure went to nothing.

“The alloy wheels were completely distorted and there was bodywork damage.

“I went back to look at the pothole when it was filled with water. It was as deep as an Irn Bru can.”

‘Waste of taxpayers’ money’

Steven lodged a £2,500 claim for damage with the council but they refused to pay out.

“They rejected it, saying the road was fine when they looked in February,” he said.

The damaged stretch of road. I
The damaged stretch of road. Image: Supplied by Steven Clinton.

“I’m now taking it to court and the council has hired a litigation lawyer to defend them. They cost an average of £200 an hour.

“It’s an absolute scandal and a waste of taxpayers’ money.

“They shouldn’t be getting away with spending money like this.”

Council settled 3% of compensation claims in a year

Steven’s case will call at Dunfermline Sheriff Court, although no date has been set yet.

His situation is far from isolated.

The AA last year branded Fife the pothole capital of Scotland, despite a £10 million investment in the region’s roads.

And Fife Council received 216 compensation claims for pothole damage between December 2021 and November 2022.

However, it paid out in only seven of the cases – a success rate of 3.2%.

And in 2020, the authority spent £1,835 on legal fees to fight a compensation claim of just £890.

Fife Council will defend pothole claim ‘if no evidence we’re legally liable’

Clare Whyte, the council’s risk management team leader, said all claims were assessed on their own merit.

She said compensation would be offered if a claimant could show the council had been negligent or breached a statutory duty.

“If the available information shows that the council isn’t at fault, the claim will be turned down,” she said.

“While we always try to reach agreement with claimants, this isn’t always possible and in those situations the court will decide.

“Where this happens, we’ll always seek legal advice and defend the case if there’s no evidence we’re legally liable to pay compensation.

“We can’t comment on any specific case when it is still before the court.”

Conversation