Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Airport chiefs say they will listen to Fifers over proposed flight path changes

Edinburgh Airport.
Edinburgh Airport.

Airport bosses have insisted they will listen to fears over proposed flight path changes after more than a quarter of responses to a consultation on the issue came from concerned Fifers.

Almost 4,000 responses were received over Edinburgh Airport’s proposals for airspace redesign following an extensive engagement programme which included 23 community drop-in and town hall sessions.

A new report on the second consultation on the airport’s Airspace Change Programme has now been published, detailing who responded, where they were and what they said, and the details are expected to help shape Edinburgh Airport’s proposals and recommendations to the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) later this summer.

Proposed new routes were published by the airport on Monday.

But it’s clear that there is a huge strength of feeling in Fife over what’s planned in the skies above the kingdom, with Fife representing 28% of the total respondents.

A total of 1,085 individuals, eight organisations and three officials from Fife responded, ranging from Kinghorn to North Queensferry, second only to 1,579 individuals who are based in West Lothian.

And more than half of the comments (51%) originating from Fife were against the proposed changes, citing noise, a perceived lack of consultation, the impact on the environment and health and wellbeing, and flying times as among their bugbears.

Gordon Dewar, chief executive of Edinburgh Airport, said: “A change in Edinburgh’s airspace is much needed in order to follow the current modernisation of all airspace across the UK, as well as building capacity to meet current and future demand.

“But it must be balanced and managed in a way that benefits Edinburgh and Scotland as a whole and minimises the impact on local communities.

“That’s why the rich and informed conversations we’ve had have been so important – to inform, debate and scrutinise.

“We acknowledge that some mistakes have been made and they have been embarrassing for us, but we have learned from and rectified them.

“However, we are confident that they did not impair the overall completeness of the consultation; we have been open in identifying them and tenacious in our attempts to fix them.

“We have actively listened and had those discussions – full-blooded at times – to gain a greater understanding of the public’s view on these proposals, which was the key aim from this second consultation.

“We now have these views and will carefully consider them as we shape our final proposals to the CAA later this summer.

“I want to personally thank everyone who has engaged with and taken an interest in our Airspace Change Programme – it has enriched our understanding of your concerns and opinions about the options we set out, and I assure you that we have listened to you and your views loud and clear.”

While 51% of the Fife comments were negative, airport bosses will have been buoyed by the fact 25% were positive – with a further 24% deemed to have taken a neutral stance.

Most of the problems raised by individuals in Fife centred around the noise of aircraft, the impact on local communities and the environment, and air pollution.

Some also argued that the consultation was based on the 2011 Census, and therefore did not take into account new house-building in west Fife.

There were complaints about a lack of consultation in the likes of North Queensferry, where it was claimed there had been no meetings set up or even basic information – such as expected flight frequencies, flight heights, noise levels and health implications – provided.

 

Here are the outcomes in relation to Fife:

Sentiment expressed:

Positive – 25%

Negative – 51%

Neutral – 24%

 

Number of positive comments:

Minimal population impact – 443

Happy with your decision – 295

Sparsely populated area – 180

Minimal environmental impact – 56

More choice of flights – 28

Economic growth – 20

Lower costs – 12

Tourism – 11

Consultation was positive – 10

Creates jobs – 6

More leisure – 2

Increased trade – 2

 

Number of negative comments:

Noise – 1117

Consultation – 689

Environment – 518

Health and wellbeing – 380

Time of flying – 314

Route issues – 284

Impact on local communities/environments – 259

Property – 196

Operational issues – 140

No need – 140

Survey process – 88

Schooling issues – 21

Political – 5