Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Further serious questions raised over Liam Fee’s death

Two-year-old Liam was murdered at his home in Thornton.
Two-year-old Liam was murdered at his home in Thornton.

Further claims have been made that major warning signs were missed prior to the murder of Fife toddler Liam Fee.

Evidence uncovered by the BBC suggests that a social worker had visited the two-year-old’s home after hospital staff raised concerns about his welfare, but no action was taken and the visit was not mentioned in a summary of an official investigation into his death.

Liam was killed at his home in Thornton in March 2014 after suffering a catalogue of abuse at the hands of his mother Rachel Fee and her partner Nyomi Fee.

A previous documentary suggested there were a number of missed opportunities by authorities to perhaps intervene, even though a significant case review into Liam’s case concluded that his death could not have been prevented.

However, new evidence that the social worker’s visit was not included in the published review has sparked renewed concern over authorities’ handling of the case – and whether or not Liam might have survived had action been taken.

Barbara Barnes, a former Fife Council social worker, said she took a call from a staff member at Kirkcaldy’s Victoria Hospital in relation to the toddler.

She told the BBC: “It was from a member of staff at Victoria Hospital who was saying that they’d had a family down.

“This couple – and she did say it was two women – had a toddler in a buggy, with a blanket over his head.

“She asked to see the toddler, and the two women refused point blank to let her see this baby.”

Ms Barnes added that she organised another social worker to pay a visit to the family home following the concerns raised, and checked the social work computer system to see what had happened after she arranged the visit.

She said: “I’d gone in and I checked, and my note was there, and the visit had been conducted because there was a note there from the duty worker for the other team, who went out.

“I can’t remember the exact words, but it was to the effect that the child was in the bedroom, he’d asked could he see the child.

“These two women had refused, saying that he suffered from autism and if he went in, seeing a strange man would upset him, and it’d take them hours to calm him down again.

“So the notes then indicated that he hadn’t seen this child.”

The latest revelations are likely to lead to renewed calls for a fuller inquiry into the circumstances leading up to Liam’s death.

Ms Barnes, who has now left Fife Council, told the BBC that the omission of these events from the published summary was a concern.

“It matters in that it’s not a true reflection of the situation involving this little boy’s death,” she said.

“In terms of it being recorded or not, it won’t bring that wee boy back to life. But it might make a difference for the next child, if it was recorded.”

Steve Grimmond, chairman of the Fife Chief Officers’ Public Safety Group, said: “Some details were not included in the Learning Summary to protect the privacy of others involved.

“That privacy is still important today. And that means we cannot respond to questions about specific incidents that are not contained in the Learning Summary.

“However, it’s important to point out that the case was not closed at the time of Liam’s death, and that all matters pertaining to Liam were fully considered by the independent lead reviewer in coming to her conclusions.

“This included reading all case files and interviewing staff who were involved with this case.”