Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Banks told to up their game over fraudsters after Kirkcaldy woman loses £278k in scam

Post Thumbnail

Banks have been urged to take better care of their customers after a Kirkcaldy woman lost a staggering £278,000 to fraudsters.

The Courier previously revealed how criminals posing as Santander persuaded ‘Lisa’ to authorise the transfer of 14 cash instalments, worth up to £20,000 each, to a fraudulent account set up in her name in July.

The criminals banked a total of £278,000 – the woman’s entire pension fund – in just over an hour as part of the so-called Automated Push Payment (APP) scam.

Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath MP Lesley Laird has blasted Santander for “quietly changing” its security policies following her constituent’s misfortune and has lodged an executive complaint with the bank.

The Kirkcaldy case was raised before the Treasury Select Committee this week as it took evidence from expert witnesses who said banks placed too much responsibility on consumers for bank fraud loss.

Richard Emery, a fraud investigator who represents 80 victims including Lisa, told the committee banks had been too slow to implement security measures which would have prevented fraud.

He revealed, following Lisa’s case, Santander has introduced a new rule whereby if a customer wishes to transfer unusually high value funds they will be obliged to instruct the bank by telephone first.

Mr Emery said: “I hope they go back to Lisa and all the other accounts that have been a victim of their failed systems.


>>24 Days of Christmas – Click here for special festive deals from some of our favourite local businesses


“This is a case of where push payment fraud is the responsibility of the sending bank because they allowed the customer to send the money. It’s a disgrace.”

Mrs Laird, who said she wrote to Santander a second time six weeks ago without a reply, added: “Liability has to rest with the banks because, as experts pointed out, that’s the only way they will be incentivised to put in place the measures needed to prevent fraud happening in the first place.

“Santander has implemented new safety measures now and should act honourably by doing the right thing by customers who fell victim due to the bank’s previous failings. They can drag this out no longer.”

The committee also heard that raising awareness and educating customers on ways to avoid bank fraud had “no impact” on reducing fraud loss in the UK.

Santander says it is not alone in being targeted, as industry data shows £145.4 million was lost to APP scams between January and June 2018.

Its new process will ask customers to pick a category of payment and specific scam avoidance guidance will be provided.

When customers make a payment, the recipient bank’s name will now also be displayed, based on the sort code, so customers can see clearly where their payment is going.

Chris Ainsley, head of fraud strategy at Santander, said: “We are pleased to be introducing these changes which we believe offer a new and unique approach to preventing payment scams, and, crucially, providing better protection and awareness for our customers.

“We are absolutely committed to fighting fraud and are actively developing other ways in which we can put a stop to the criminals who ruin people’s lives.”