Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

‘They’re trying to cram them in’: Developer told to rethink housing along Forfar’s Rosie roadie

Forfar Rosie road.
Forfar Rosie road.

Developers have been sent away to rethink a plan for housing along Forfar’s historic Rosie roadie after criticism of trying to fit too many homes into the rolling site.

Angus Council’s development standards committee unanimously backed the official refusal recommendation for the 81-home bid lodged by Stirling-based Ogilvie Homes.

The Arbroath Road site is allocated for around 60 homes in the Angus local plan.

The Rosie road looking south.

The Rosie roadie is a historic core path running between the Arbroath and Montrose roads to the east of Forfar, splitting the undulating six hectare site.

Acoustic barrier

Planning officer Murray Agnew told Tuesday’s meeting department didn’t support the idea of garden fences backing onto the Rosie roadie.

“It would not result in a safe or pleasant place to walk if rear boundary treatments were to be put along its length,” he said.

“It would be a very boundary dominated layout with walls and fences at virtually every turn.”

Officials were also critical of an acoustic barrier more than four metres high on the east side of the site to screen homes from the adjacent concrete plant.

Ogilvie Homes wants to build houses on each side of the core path.

Mr Agnew added: “Deploying fairly extreme acoustic barriers is potentially indicative of the fact that the proposal is for too many houses for the site.

Drainage concerns

The council’s environmental health department objected to the plan over public health concerns around the potential impact on existing private drainage infrastructure within the application site.

Brechin and Edzell councillor Bob Myles said: “I think the officers have got it spot on.

“It’s too big a development, and there’s not enough being done to mitigate the problems for drainage and screening requirements.”

Arbroath councillor Brenda Durno said: “It’s unfortunate that when we have housing targets to meet that we are finding people are trying to squeeze too many houses into plots like this.”

Planning officials recommended the application for refusal.

Arbroath colleague Alex King added: “I usually support housing, but I was appalled when I heard the original application was 108 and we are still substantially over with this number.

“This is a developer just trying to cram them in. I just don’t find that acceptable,” he said.

Brechin and Edzell councillor Kenny Braes added: “This is for 35% more houses than was deemed appropriate under the local development plan.

“It’s quite a difficult site to develop and it looks like the developer has just tried to get as many houses as possible to mitigate that.

“I really don’t understand why the developer has pushed this forward.

“But they’ll have learned a bit today about what might be acceptable in the future.”