Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

William Hill paid £500,000 to Dundee City Council following fraudster’s conviction

Mark Conway, left, and a William Hill shop, right.
Mark Conway, left, and a William Hill shop, right.

Gambling giant William Hill handed Dundee City Council £500,000 following the conviction of IT fraudster Mark Conway.

Conway was jailed in 2017 after he was found to have defrauded the local authority out of £1.065 million through an elaborate purchasing scheme.

Following a meeting of the council’s scrutiny committee in December, it was reported a gambling operator had paid an “ex gratia” payment to the local authority.

An “ex gratia” payment is one made from a sense of moral obligation rather than because of any legal requirement.

The Courier discovered who paid the undisclosed sum, and its value, using freedom of information legislation.

Despite being outed as the company “handing back” the proceeds of Conway’s crime, William Hill plc refused to answer questions put to them.

A spokesperson for the company blankly refused to comment as to why they felt “morally” obliged to give Dundee City Council £500,000.

Addiction charity Gamble Aware said William Hill should have been aware of the “obvious signal” Conway’s spending would have shown, something highlighted by the figure William Hill handed to Dundee City Council.

A spokesperson said: “Gambling companies should be constantly looking for any indication that their customers are getting into trouble with their gambling.

“One obvious signal is a higher than normal level of spending, which these figures suggest could have been very clear.

“It would be disappointing if, in such a case, this was not spotted and properly investigated.

“It is quite right that where funds are the proceeds of crime, they are returned to the rightful owner and in the past, the Gambling Commission has required this when it reviews such cases to see if there has been a breach of the bookmaker’s gambling licence.”

Labour councillor Richard McCready, who tabled a motion calling on chief executive David Martin to write to the Gambling Commission and the Department of Digital Culture, Media and Sport, said the issue was incredibly “grubby”.

He said: “It is clear Mark Conway is the main culprit in this case, however there has been a failure on behalf of the banks, the gambling commission, William Hill and the council and it is important we learn the lessons from this.

“I also understand in these times of austerity, the council needs money wherever it can get it, but I am not convinced the council should allow William Hill to clear their conscience with this payment.

“There are no conditions attached to this payment but the whole issue is just a little bit grubby.

“I’m sure the gambling industry will say they will always spot problem users, but it is obvious in this case they did not.

“William Hill are a well known, High Street company and you would expect better from them. This fraud was discovered, to some extent, by chance. If it had not been discovered, Conway could still be spending stolen money with William Hill.”

The Gambling Commission said it could not comment on the issue, because of its role as industry regulator.

A spokesperson for Dundee City Council said: “The council has written to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport and is awaiting a response.”