Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Experts say Forth rail tunnel is no pipe dream – and could be complete in five to seven years

Campaigners have urged ministers to give the Forth tunnel plan a decent airing following the success of other undersea tunnels elsewhere.
Campaigners have urged ministers to give the Forth tunnel plan a decent airing following the success of other undersea tunnels elsewhere.

Construction experts have claimed a new Firth of Forth tunnel crossing is not just a pipe dream but entirely feasible and could be done in just five to seven years.

Eyebrows were raised earlier this month when the Scottish Green Party unveiled costed plans for a nine-mile long twin bore rail tunnel under the estuary, which would stretch from a point between Kirkcaldy and Seafield in Fife through to Leith on the Edinburgh side.

The Greens’ ‘Rail for All’ plan described the project, which would come with an estimated £4-6 billion price tag, as a “game-changer” that would vastly reduce travel times, improve punctuality and release capacity over the Forth Bridge that could be used for extra services to Dunfermline, west Fife and Alloa.

Sceptics have already dismissed the plans as unworkable, and sources close to the Scottish Government suggest it is unlikely to feature as an investment priority when it publishes its Strategic Transport Projects Review, which will set out major projects planned for the next 20 years.

However, the chairman of one of the country’s leading tunnelling specialists has told The Courier people should not be too quick to dismiss the initiative.

Martin Knights, chair of London Bridge Associates, which has been involved in several high-profile projects including the Channel Tunnel Rail Link, upgrades to the London Underground and The second Dublin Area Rapid Transit Underground scheme, believes further work should be done to quantify the project’s feasibility in terms of cost, programme, delivery and risk.

“While not without hydrographical and geological risks from carboniferous and volcanic formations, dykes, faults and varying profile of sea bed and rockhead, recent subaqueous tunnelling projects in the UK and Nordic countries have demonstrated that tunnelling of this nature is entirely feasible,” he said.

“This is demonstrated by the spectacular advances in tunnel boring machine and blasting technology for hard rock and variable ground conditions.

“These advances in tunnelling technology make it possible to consider undersea transit crossings such as the UK government’s current Union Connectivity initiative, chaired by Sir Peter Hendy, between Northern Ireland and Scotland.”

Mr Knights also pointed to work in Norway and Japan for how advances in tunnelling capability are already delivering deep sea tunnel schemes.

London Bridge Associates were involved with the Channel Tunnel Rail Link project.

His comments were also echoed by Dr Sauer and Partners, an independent consultancy which provides construction management services for tunnels, shafts and caverns.

The company’s managing director Brian Lyons said challenges in the Forth could be managed by “modern bored tunnelling techniques” – as demonstrated on major crossings of the River Thames in recent years.

And he maintained: “The UK tunnelling industry has the skills and capacity to deliver this project within a timeline of five to seven years.”

Deltix Transport Consulting, which was commissioned by the Greens to produce the report, also suggested there has been a long history of boring under the Forth for coal mining, noting that railway tunnels “much longer than this” have become relatively common in mainland Europe.

David Prescott, who co-wrote the report with David Spaven, added: “At a stroke, the Forth tunnel can transform the geography of Scotland, just as the Forth Bridge did 130 years ago and the Forth Road Bridge nearly 60 years ago.

“It would substantially cut the distance between Edinburgh and east Fife, Dundee, Aberdeen, Perth and Inverness, whilst also putting Leith at the heart of the Scottish rail network.

“The Forth tunnel would give this generation of Scottish engineers the opportunity to continue the strong traditions of their illustrious predecessors – creating transformational infrastructure for the nation.”

A spokesperson for the Scottish Government has not ruled out the project but appeared to pour scorn on any hope of it happening soon.

“Aspirational projects, such as the Firth of Forth tunnel, would be subject to the same scrutiny from the earliest stages to ensure they merited any serious consideration,” the spokesperson said.