Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Halting Cross Tay Link Road would lead to housing boom in rural Perthshire, councillor claims

Angus Forbes, environment and infrastructure convener for Perth and Kinross Council
Angus Forbes, environment and infrastructure convener for Perth and Kinross Council

A senior councillor has warned that scrapping the Cross Tay Link Road could lead to swathes of housing developments in the rural Carse of Gowrie.

Angus Forbes, environment and infrastructure convener for Perth and Kinross Council, said last week he had concerns about the impact of his administration’s £118 million project on rural roads.

The Carse Conservative councillor was speaking ahead of a meeting later this week to decide the flagship project’s fate, as part of a review of the council’s capital budget.

There is growing concern from Carse of Gowrie residents who believe the new crossing – linking the A9 to the A93 and A94 – will create rat runs past their homes.

Last week, people in Rait and Abernyte pointed out that motorists coming off the A9 and heading east along the A90 will be directed by navigation systems along the narrow Rait Road.

Now Mr Forbes said he has been reassured about the scheme after meeting with council officers.

He revealed that some measures could be put in place to ease traffic problems in rural areas.

And he warned if the new crossing did not go ahead, the council would have no choice but to offer land to housing developers in the Carse of Gowrie.

Mr Forbes said last week that he supported the CTLR “in principal” but had concerns about “unintended consequences”.

He was accused by SNP councillor Fiona Sarwar of a “dereliction of his duties” for not fully investigating these matters earlier.

Mr Forbes confirmed he supported the project “and the economic benefits it brings to Perth,” adding: “If Perth benefits, then the whole of Perth and Kinross benefits.”

He said: “However, there has always been concerns in villages across the high Carse area that this could bring an increase in traffic and these concerns increased as the vote came closer.

“As a ward member, it was important for me to respond to these concerns and as promised, I have met again with council officers from traffic, planning and road safety. I was given certain assurances that satisfy my concerns and hopefully those of my constituents.”

He said that roads will be assessed for an extension of existing 40mph walking and cycling routes. This, he said, would be a condition of planning consent.

“Additionally, I was assured that sufficient signage will be in place on the A94 directing Dundee-bound traffic away from the north side of the Carse of Gowrie.

“The council has an obligation to provide land for housing, and this land is identified to the west of Perth and relies on the CTLR.

“If we can’t provide that land, the housing demand still exists and we will need to provide land someplace else. It doesn’t take a genius to work out that the Carse of Gowrie would be a likely place for that house building, given its proximity to Dundee.

“That is another concern for me and I would say to my Carse of Gowrie colleagues to think carefully about this before they vote.”

Mr Forbes rejected accusations of “dereliction of duty” saying he had been working to resolve the traffic issue for months.

Ms Sarwar, a member of the SNP’s sub-group on the Climate Change Emergency, added: “As with all development and road infrastructure, there is the potential for further pollution and environmental damage.

“However, it is also true that with good design this road can connect a much greater network for cycling and sustainable travel.”