Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Calls to resurrect massive Almond Valley housing plan

Almond Valley plans are being laid before the Scottish Government
Almond Valley plans are being laid before the Scottish Government

Perthshire residents who battled a massive housing expansion are facing a fresh fight.

The highly contentious Almond Valley project, a vision of nearly 1,300 homes on the western edge of Perth, was thrown out by councillors after widespread opposition from neighbours.

Locals argued that the development was not needed and said it would transform a scenic countryside spot into a building site for the next 20 years.

In May, members of the development management committee rejected the scheme, against the advice of planners and legal officers.

Councillors said it would have a detrimental impact on neighbouring properties and that the land was at risk of flooding.

Now the Pilkington Trust, which is behind the scheme, has taken its case to the Scottish Government and called for the councillors’ decision to be overturned.

And the company wants the local authority to pay its appeal expenses, claiming councillors had acted “unreasonably”.

In paperwork submitted to Scottish Ministers, a spokesman for Edinburgh-based Pilkington said: “The development has clear and straightforward policy support and the reasons for refusal do not bear scrutiny.

“Further, the express and clear advice of the committee’s own advisers, both planning and legal, was that there was no basis to support the reasons that were proposed.”

He added: “It is unreasonable to impose the delay and cost that this appeal entails with no good reasons to refuse planning and many good reasons to grant.”

The planning application attracted 85 letters and emails from locals calling for the scheme to be scrapped. About 50 opponents attended the council talks in May.

Ken Simpson, chairman of the 
Methven and District Community 
Council, told the committee: “The residents have had to put up with this proposal in various forms since 1990 – that’s 26 years.

“The local people and the people of Perth do not want this.”

He said that there were already about 11,000 proposed homes in and around the city. “Where are the people coming from to buy these houses? Are we going to become a dormitory city settlement?”

Mr Simpson added: “This 
development will definitely not be good for the local community who could find themselves living near a building site for the next 20 years.”

Local councillor Alan Livingstone said there was “unanimous local hostility” to the project.

At the same meeting, councillors approved the even bigger £1 billion Berth Park project, which will see 3,000 houses created on the outskirts of the city.

The Scottish Government appeal bosses are expected to visit the site in the coming weeks. They will consider the views of all objectors before making a decision and could call a public inquiry.

Their findings are likely to be published in September.