Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Pitlochry anger at Scottish Woodlands choosing logging route that its own officer rated ‘unsafe’

Campaigners Adam Lloyd, Laura Young, Paul Mayhead and Jason Young at East Haugh.
Campaigners Adam Lloyd, Laura Young, Paul Mayhead and Jason Young at East Haugh.

Villagers near Pitlochry are angry at Scottish Woodlands for choosing a logging route that its own officer rated ‘unsafe’ in a damning assessment.

The organisation is currently deciding where lorries should transport timber harvested from the Ballyoukan plantation east of Pitlochry.

Scottish Woodlands has informed the community council that its chosen route is Ballyoukan Hill and General Wade’s Military Road.

This would mean that, over a 10-year period, 4,800 loads of timber would be transported via 10,000 lorry movements through East Haugh, West Haugh, Ballyoukan, Dalshian, Donavourd and Croftinloan.

The plan has caused both anger and bafflement among locals.

The anger is rooted in safety concerns regarding lorries travelling along the steep and narrow Ballyoukan Hill and turning blindly onto General Wade’s Military Road in East Haugh.

The bafflement is due to Scottish Woodlands criticising this very notion in a damning assessment last year.

“The report was damning,” said Jason Young, who is part of a campaign to stop Ballyoukan Hill being on the logging route.

Damning report outlined ‘blind corners’

In May 2021, Scottish Woodlands‘ forest manager Jillian Kennedy presented eight transport options in a briefing paper.

It comprehensively dismissed option three, along Ballyoukan Hill to East Haugh.

Vehicles approaching East Haugh at Ballyoukan Hill have to navigate a blind corner onto General Wade’s Military Road.

Ms Kennedy wrote that the route “is unsuitable for timber transport due to several sensitivities.”

She added: “Although suitable for light vehicles, the tarmacked access traverses 765m of shared residential private way, with excessive gradients, blind corners, hidden driveways, soft verges, and minimal laybys (which are currently only usable for light vehicles, and only on the top half of the road).

“The access is structurally vulnerable to HGV usage, directly adjacent to watercourses and does not meet current timber haulage road width standards, particularly at bends.

“There is no pedestrian pavement which increases the unsafe nature of this haulage option and the road is bounded by sections of retaining wall which are structurally unsound.”

Assessment said route ‘poses a danger’

The assessment then described General Wade’s Military Road as “vulnerable” and says the route would include “unfavourable junctions in either direction for accessing the A9.”

It added: “The haulage route would therefore be required to cross under the low railway bridge at East Haugh and be required to move through the length of Pitlochry.

“The access onto General Wade’s Military Road is also very narrow and could likely prove difficult to negotiate.

“The line of sight from here is not adequate for the manoeuvres required to exit the road end at Ballyoukan, and therefore poses a danger to oncoming traffic.

“Even with significant modifications the road would not be suitable, only passable.”

The assessment recommended option one, which would go via Moulin Moor onto a recognised timber route, the A924, north of Pitlochry.

It stated that this had “stakeholder support” from landowner Atholl Estates.

U-turn – ‘very strongly’

However, Scottish Woodlands is now believed to favour the very option it rubbished.

It has informed Pitlochry and Moulin Community Council that Ballyoukan Hill is the preferred route and surveyors have recently made regular visits to the area.

Fergus McCallum, deputy secretary of Pitlochry and Moulin Community Council.

Fergus McCallum, the community council’s deputy secretary, says Scottish Woodlands has listed two other options.

These are via the Forest of Clunie to the south-east and Kindrogan Forest to the north-east. The latter is the community council’s preference.

“The community council has met with Scottish Woodlands a few times and it has come across very strongly that Ballyoukan Hill is the favoured route,” Cllr McCallum said.

“The road looks too steep and narrow but Scottish Woodlands said we can have an engineer report.

“But we haven’t seen that yet. That would make it easier to make a decision.

“We prefer the Kindrogan Forest route but we don’t want to cause problems for other community council areas, which is why it should be looked at by Perth and Kinross Council.”

‘Heritable right doesn’t make it safe’

Residents have begun a campaign to stop the timber lorries from using Ballyoukan Hill.

Their Facebook page has more than 200 members.

Members suspect that money is the reason for not opting for other routes, because they would involve paying landowners.

They also expressed concern at a lack of consultation.

Jason Young.

“There are safe routes that can be used but they won’t because they cost money,” Mr Young said.

“The Ballyoukan Hill route is free because Scottish Woodlands says it has a heritable right to use it.

“I challenged them on it, saying this doesn’t mean it is necessarily safe to use it.”

‘This is happening all over’

The dismay from residents follows a recent story in The Courier about a new timber transport route through Comrie that was approved by using information gathered via Google Maps.

Adam Lloyd.

Fellow campaigner Adam Lloyd said: “We want strategic leadership from Perth and Kinross Council to recognise that we have lots of forests coming out over the next 10 years or so so let’s find a route that keeps them away from communities.”

Mr Young added: “The bigger picture is that this is happening all over.

“It’s divide and conquer – take on a small community, where there’s a lot of elderly who won’t be on email and Facebook.”

Perth and Kinross Provost Xander McDade, councillor for Highland ward, says he is taking action against Scottish Woodlands.

Provost Xander McDade.

He said: “Like local residents I am concerned about the lack of proper engagement around these proposals.

“Scottish Woodlands had committed to come back to me and other stakeholders once they had spoken to neighbouring land owners about alternative options, but have failed to do so.

“As a result of their continued poor community consultation I am writing to Scottish Forestry as the regulator to express my own and wider concerns about what appears to be Scottish Woodlands’ continued refusal to properly engage with the community and their representatives.

“I have been speaking to council officers about the limited powers the council does have to control aspects of this proposal and I will be seeking to ensure we use those limited powers to their full potential.”

Scottish Woodlands – ‘current and only access’

Charles Bushby, regional manager for Scottish Woodlands, explained that the woodlands were planted in the late 1980s to produce commercial conifers.

“As part of the acquisition a heritable right of access was purchased which joins the old A9 at East Haugh,” he added.

“This is the current and only access to Ballyoukan Forest, which provides a legal route into and out of the forest for all forestry purposes, which includes the movement of timber lorries.”

He stated that the Moulin Moor route was identified but, “prior to discussing terms, this became unavailable to us.”

Charles Bushby, regional manager for Scottish Woodlands.

Mr Bushby continued: “Thus we have commissioned a civil engineer to provide us with a report on the suitability of the access road to the forest as we recognise that it is steep with some difficult corners.

“The owners’ heritable right of access enables us to make improvements to this access road but in the event that the civil engineer deems it to be unsuitable we are considering other options all of which are commercially sensitive at this time.”

Alternative A924 route?

Moulin Moor has now been ruled out but an alternative route via the A924 is still an option, Mr Bushby said.

“We have approached our neighbours to determine if another suitable access is possible and we have yet to survey some of these potential routes,” he added.

“Until we are offered another access by a landowner and, if we are granted permission to build a suitable road, we are unable to provide local residents with further updates.”

Conversation