Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

KEZIA DUGDALE: The real outrage in the Geoffrey Cox second jobs scandal? Nobody’s that shocked

Sir Geoffrey Cox is the latest Tory MP caught up in the deepening second jobs row.
Sir Geoffrey Cox is the latest Tory MP caught up in the deepening second jobs row.

Outrage! Everywhere we look. There’s so much to be angry about, it’s hard to know where to start.

We’re angry at politicians flying in from all over the globe to discuss the impact of climate change.

We’re angry about Covid-19 restrictions getting tighter again as the Prime Minister dodges a difficult debate in Parliament to walk the corridors of a hospital without a mask.

And now we’re angry that a serving MP spent a chunk of lockdown in the Caribbean earning hundreds of thousands of pounds on the side as a lawyer defending a corruption case.

The case of Geoffrey Cox and the unfolding second jobs scandal has the potential to threaten the standing of our politicians, and therefore the health of our political system, much as the MP expenses scandal did a decade ago.

The truth is though it’s been hiding in plain sight.

Sir Geoffrey Cox’s example might be the most egregious, because it includes palm trees, a six figure sum and the abuse of a voting system designed to support people working from home, but it’s far from the only one.

The reality is that more than 200 MPs out of 650 have registered some form of second income.

The nature of those jobs is varied, from working in care homes during the pandemic, to farming. From taking on legal cases for worthy causes to being an NHS surgeon.

Dozens are consultants to companies, despite clear rules around lobbying and access to power.

Geoffrey Cox delivering a speech at the Conservative Party annual conference in 2018: Photo: Aaron Chown/PA Wire

It is a consistent pattern across all the major political parties.

By registering this income, the MPs are following the rules not breaking them.

In fact, you can’t point to a rule which Sir Geoffrey Cox broke while he was in the British Virgin Islands, other than perhaps your own moral code.

What is the MP’s job description anyway?

What might catch him out yet though is the latest suggestion that he did legal work connected to the case from within his Parliamentary office.

Footage emerged on Wednesday of him leaving a zoom meeting for 20 minutes because the division bell rang.

But everything we are reading about Geoffrey Cox, second jobs and lobbying speaks to a much bigger, fundamental problem – our political system itself is sick and in fundamental need of treatment.

For a start, is being an MP really a job?

I’m not being facetious, I mean it.

Is there a clear job specification with the role and responsibilities clearly laid out? No.

Do MPs get a set number of days of annual leave? No.

Do they have clear maternity/paternity rights and proper cover should they be on long term sick leave? No.

Do they have a contract saying they have to work exclusively for their constituents and no one else? No.

If their first job isn’t clear, then just how outraged can we be about their second one?

It is a privileged and well paid existence being a member of Parliament, so let’s spare them our pity. It’s also one still largely and exclusively for the middle aged, middle class white man.

Public trust is at stake here

Of all the anger and disappointment I’ve felt in the past week, I was particularly irritated by the consequences this might have for remote voting.

These are the mechanisms brought in during the pandemic to allow MPs to vote from home electronically.

Before then votes could only be cast by walking the aye and no lobbies like sardines in a Covid-infested can.

Boris Johnson skipped this week’s Commons debate on standards to carry out a hospital visit. Photo: Peter Summers/ PA Wire.

The John Smith Centre, which I run, commissioned a poll into what the public think about their MPs voting remotely.

Nearly two thirds of people support it if it means MPs representing remote or rural constituencies can do their job better.

Over 60% supported it if it meant more women and people with caring responsibilities could stand for Parliament. That’s more people like us.

I suspect that support will shatter if the public think all it achieves is helping MPs cash in from the Caribbean.

And in the long term that just consolidates politics as a vocation for rich and privileged people to advocate for rich and privileged people.

Which takes us to the issue of trust.

Geoffrey Cox second jobs reaction suggests the public expect rules to be broken

Our research also shows that you are three times more likely to think the political system is working if you earn more than £60,000 a year than if you earn the living wage.

Most sage political commentators think this second jobs scandal is a bit of a “bubble” issue – something which is a bigger matter in the corridors of power than it is in the factory canteen.

They say it lacks “cut through”. And if the voters aren’t really listening then who cares? And if no one cares nothing will change.

There’s a truth to that.

The evidence shows us that where trust is low in politicians, and it is and always has been, the public expect laws to be disobeyed and rules broken.

It turns out, most of us aren’t that bothered because we didn’t really expect any better of the people who lead us.

Maybe it’s high time we were more outraged about that.