Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

READERS’ LETTERS: Anonymity anomaly unfair to sex accused

Sir Cliff Richard.
Sir Cliff Richard.

Madam, – Cliff Richard is right to seek anonymity for those accused of sex crimes since naming the accused before they are formally charged breaches the rules of natural justice and, in the febrile atmosphere of #MeToo-ism, wrecks lives.

Anonymously accused of a sex crime, Sir Cliff’s good name was devastated by a publicity-seeking police force in collusion with a scoop-seeking BBC. Both later admitted fault and the BBC paid damages – but it was too late.

Similar malicious treatment has been meted out to other public figures where the police became judge and jury in effectively punishing a number of well-known men for a crime of which none were convicted or even charged.

Sex crimes are complicated and there’s a case for making the accuser anonymous but the case for instantly revealing the identity of the accused – that other witnesses might recognise the name and come forward – is inadequate.

Richard et al aren’t arguing for an end to anonymity, only for pre-charge anonymity for the accused.

The victims aren’t just VIPs – doctors, students and ordinary people lose their good name and as a result their jobs and family.

Rev Dr John Cameron,

10 Howard Place,

St Andrews.

 

Bad losers don’t accept blame

Madam, – The last thing Scotland needs is another referendum on Scottish independence.

In the run-up to 2014 we were subjected to the radical doctrines of Alex Salmond; and now it is those of Nicola Sturgeon which are exceedingly tiresome.

The will of the electorate of Scotland was very clearly expressed in 2014 when independence was rejected on the basis of a ratio of 56:44 in favour of the status quo.

Out of the 32 local authority areas, only four returned a majority for independence.

Surely that result should have been sufficient to convince the separatists that the people had absolutely rejected their unwelcome policies.

But it would appear not – since we still have Sturgeon, Swinney and Michael Russell at Holyrood and Ian Blackford based at Westminster, all complaining incessantly about everything British.

The SNP does not even have a majority at Holyrood; yet because of a pact with the Greens we still have to put up with being governed by them.

The separatists have deployed almost every means possible to discredit the opposition; they have rejected vociferously every Unionist policy in action throughout Scotland.

It goes without saying the SNP will most certainly fail to persuade the UK Government that there should be a re-run of the 2014 referendum.

Most of us remember it was described as a “once in a generation” event.

Bad losers always blame everyone else, including the referee, for their misfortune – such is the rationale of the SNP.

Whether or not we are persuaded that a Tory Government, with its soon-to-be-appointed new leader, is to our liking or not, the proper time to take action will be at the next General Election.

Robert I G Scott,

Northfield,

Ceres,

Fife.

 

Brexit’s already happened

Madam, – In The London High Court the English Democrats are challenging the postponement of Brexit on the sound legal argument that Theresa May did not have Parliamentary approval to Extend Article 50.

Such a decision would require the enactment of an Act of Parliament granting the Prime Minister the power to postpone Brexit.

Since there was no legislative mandate the UK actually left the EU on March 29.

The Brexit decision has been delivered in secrecy because the political establishment like to play the game of smoke and mirrors, even when they know the truth.

Sebestian Wordsworth,

St Anne Street,

Limehouse.

 

Democracy is slipping away

Madam, – The BBC needs its wings clipped.

Why are they paying so much to middle class celebs and employees?

It is time the BBC went from a public service broadcaster to being a paid-for data service.

This country’s government and MPs take the people for mugs.

A poll tax is being forced on every one who owns a TV.

It is immaterial that they watch the BBC, they have to pay.

Then there is the House of Lords, 800 members that cost us £67.9 million for doing what? Do we need so many politicians and royals on the payroll?

MPs have stolen our democracy and our vote.

We don’t hear them calling for the BBC to be wound up, why?

Because it is a nice little earner for some.

Democracy is slipping away from the people.

John G Phimister,

63 St Clair St,

Kirkcaldy.

 

Students must contribute

Madam, – Students living in Scotland who want to study medicine at university will be given priority over those from other parts of the UK in an attempt to relieve the NHS staffing crisis, since data suggests students already living in Scotland are more likely to stay after graduation.

Yes, and there are fairies at the bottom of my garden. It takes more than five years for a doctor to qualify and the NHS crisis is now.

All students living in Scotland and those from the EU get free tuition whereas those from the rest of the UK have to pay. Free education for EU students alone has cost over £2 billion.

If they want doctors and others to stay, including EU students, then politicians should state that since Scottish taxpayers are funding them they must agree to work in Scotland for five years. No agreement no free tuition.

NHS and skilled workforce problem solved.

Clark Cross,

138 Springfield Road,

Linlithgow.

 

Stiff penalties for grave vandals

Madam, – I like many other readers was appalled to read about the gratuitous vandalism on the war graves at Wellshill cemetery (Anger at deliberate attack on cemetery, Courier, June 29).

It is exceedingly disrespectful.

There have been similar incidents over the years of vandalism to graves.

I believe part of the problem is the sentences given out to offenders are far too lenient.

The whole point of the courts should be to punish and act as a deterrent to other would-be offenders.

Too often the courts use fines and community service orders, hardly a deterrent, or it does not reflect the public revulsion to this type of offence.

A change in the law is needed so that there is an automatic custodial sentence given to those who vandalise graves.

Gordon Kennedy,

117 Simpson Square,

Perth.

 

Graveyards are sacred grounds

Madam, – The attack at Wellshill Cemetery is beyond reason.

Why would vandals desecrate memorials to Polish victims of war?

Not only will it anger the War Graves Commission and politicians, but it causes such hurt to Polish residents within Perth and the wider community.

Sadly the situation at Wellshill is not an isolated case.

If there is any place which should be sacred and peaceful a country churchyard it should be.

Thomas A Brown,

18 Garry Place,

Bankfoot.