Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Alex Salmond fears ‘enormous reputational damage’

Former First Minister Alex Salmond.

Alex Salmond feared publicity about the Scottish Government’s sexual misconduct inquiry would damage a potential return to politics, newly released documents suggest.

A letter from Mr Salmond’s lawyer claimed there was a “real prospect of enormous reputational damage” to the former first minister if harassment claims were made public.

The letter was contained in a 147-page submission made by Mr Salmond to the Holyrood committee examining the Scottish Government’s mishandled investigation into the claims made against the former first minister.

There is a real prospect of enormous reputational damage to our client in the event that confidentiality is not preserved. Our client’s prospects of standing for public office or obtaining employment or pursuing business opportunities would be hugely damaged.”

David McKie, Alex Salmond’s lawyer

The submission included letters outlining multiple attempts to settle Mr Salmond’s dispute with the Scottish Government via arbitration or mediation as well as pleas for privacy.

In the end, Mr Salmond’s attempts to settle the matter outside the courts failed and he successfully took a judicial review against the Scottish Government, which found that its internal inquiry into the ex-SNP leader was unlawful and tainted with apparent bias.

Mr Salmond’s successful legal action led to the Scottish Government forking out more than £500,000 in taxpayers’ cash for his legal costs.

In a separate criminal case Mr Salmond was cleared earlier this year of all sexual offences at the conclusion of a high-profile trial.

Concerns over confidentiality

In one letter to Scotland’s most senior civil servant, Leslie Evans, dated June 26 2018, Mr Salmond’s lawyer, David McKie of Levy McRae, told Ms Evans, the Permanent Secretary, that she had recognised that confidentiality of the Scottish Government procedure.

Mr McKie said: “There is a real prospect of enormous reputational damage to our client in the event that confidentiality is not preserved. Our client’s prospects of standing for public office or obtaining employment or pursuing business opportunities would be hugely damaged.

“You allude to the possibility that you might be under a duty to disclose the outcome. As you know we totally disagree with that suggestion.”

When the letter was sent Mr Salmond was no longer in front line politics for the first time in decades, having lost his Gordon seat at Westminster to Conservative MP Colin Clark.

Alex Salmond while he was MP for Gordon.

Some of Mr Salmond’s supporters have suggested that his opponents within the SNP were keen to prevent him from making a comeback and have suggested he has been the victim of a conspiracy. Others close to Mr Salmond have played down suggestions he was interested in returning to elected politics.

The newly released correspondence also revealed Mr McKie wrote to Ms Evans, asking the permanent secretary not to tell Nicola Sturgeon about the Scottish Government’s investigation into his client.

The letter was sent on June 13 2018, even though a couple of months earlier Mr Salmond had met with Ms Sturgeon in her family home to inform her of the probe.

Ms Sturgeon has told the Scottish Parliament that the meeting with her predecessor when they discussed the matter was held on April 2 that year.

Mr McKie’s letter sought an assurance from Ms Evans that the “strict confidentiality” surrounding the process would be observed. He said any communication or publication of the existence of the proceedings would violate Mr Salmond’s right to privacy.

The lawyer added: “In the event that you do communicate any of these matters to any person (including the First Minister) in a purported application of the 2017 Procedure, you will be doing so in breach of confidence.”

In another letter, this time dated April 23 2018, Mr McKie claimed one of the allegations made against Mr Salmond had been dealt with under the procedure, which was in place before a new anti-harassment code was developed in the wake of the #MeToo movement.

Mr McKie argued that it was not appropriate to “resurrect it now under a new procedure which was not in force (not even in contemplation) when the incident giving rise to the complaint occurred”.

Legal papers tell ‘one side of the story’

The Scottish Conservatives claimed the letter raised questions about Ms Sturgeon’s claims that she did not know about concerns about Mr Salmond’s behaviour.

Tory MSP Murdo Fraser said: “It raises a serious question if Nicola Sturgeon, then Deputy First Minister, can credibly claim to have not known anything about Alex Salmond’s alleged behaviour.

“Crucially, these legal papers from Alex Salmond only tell us one side of the story. The Scottish Government won’t release so many key documents, particularly the legal advice they received, that we’re still in the dark about the scale of their mistakes.”

The Conservatives are to lead a Holyrood debate calling for the Scottish Government to publish the legal advice it received ahead of its civil court battle with Mr Salmond.

In evidence submitted to the inquiry, Ms Sturgeon has said she had “no general concerns at the time about Scottish Government culture from 2008 to 2014 and certainly not about sexual harassment”.

A Scottish Government spokesman added: “As the First Minister has repeatedly made clear, she looks forward to giving evidence in person to the committee in due course, and is awaiting a date from the committee to do so.”