Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Government has to look at ‘all big infrastructure projects’, says Green MSP

The A96 between Inverurie and Huntly.
The A96 between Inverurie and Huntly.

The Greens’ north-east MSP has revealed she is confident it will “not be viable” to fully dual the A96 for environmental reasons.

Doubt has been cast on the long-term plan to fully dual the A96 between Aberdeen and Inverness, after the SNP and Greens announced their power-sharing deal last month.

Both parties agreed to “maintain distinct positions” on the dualling of the route but  agreed a review be carried out to assess the climate impact.

Speaking on the The Stooshie – the politics podcast from DC Thomson –  Green MSP Maggie Chapman revealed she is confident this assessment will find that it “actually isn’t viable to dual the whole way”.

New MSP Maggie Chapman
North-east MSP Maggie Chapman.

However, a Transport Scotland spokeswoman said the “current plan is to fully dual the A96 route between Inverness and Aberdeen” but acknowledged the review which will report by the end of next year.

Scottish Conservative shadow transport secretary Liam Kerr claimed the Greens “seem to be unpicking each and every one of the SNP’s manifesto commitments”.

Ms Chapman, who represents the north-east, said the government has to “look at all big infrastructure projects and consider very carefully what it is we’re trying to achieve with them”.

The A96 had been due a full upgrade.

In terms of the A96 project specifically, Ms Chapman said there are “clear areas where there does need to be some work done for safety purposes” but the government has to “take a step back and look at this in the whole”.

She added: “We made our position in our manifesto clear and given the commitments from the Scottish Government to undertake climate impact assessments on these kind of projects, I think it’s going to be very clear that it actually isn’t viable to dual the whole way.

“That doesn’t mean we can’t perhaps tackle specific issues of safety or of congestion but I think there are ways other than building roads everywhere that allow us to increase connectivity and increase viable public transport options.”


The Stooshie

To listen and subscribe, free, search for ‘The Stooshie’ on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts!


Scottish Conservative shadow transport secretary Liam Kerr said completing the A96 dualling was an election promise of the SNP in their most recent manifesto.

He added: “Covid was blamed for delays over the past year but the pledge was maintained.

“If that is amended in any way by politics – not by the consultation process – it will be an unforgivable stain on the SNP.

“Voters in the north east will be wondering what comes next out of the coalition of chaos.”

Campaign to dual road

The campaign to dual the road stretches back more than three decades, with figures once showing it was once dubbed Scotland’s “most dangerous road”.

In March 1989, the Press and Journal launched the ‘End the Carnage – Spend the Cash’ campaign, demanding major improvements to the trunk road.

The Press & Journal reporting on the campaign to dual the route on January 23, 1991.

More than 60,000 people signed the petition which called on the UK Government to “act swiftly” on the issue.

A Transport Scotland spokeswoman said: “The Scottish Government is committed to improving the A96 and will take forward a transport enhancements programme on the corridor that improves connectivity between surrounding towns, tackles congestion and addresses safety and environmental issues.

“The current plan is to fully dual the A96 route between Inverness and Aberdeen, however the Scottish Government has agreed to conduct a transparent, evidence-based review of the programme which will report by the end of 2022.  This is sensible good governance for major investment of this kind.

“Work on other trunk roads projects and programmes under construction, design, development or procurement will continue and be subject to the normal statutory assessment and business case processes.”


Analysis: ‘Agree to disagree’ doesn’t cut it here

Nicola Sturgeon is used to being accused of kicking the can down the road in party political spats on stubborn problems, writes Andy Philip, Press & Journal political editor.

When it comes to the A96 improvement scheme, that can has been rattling around longer than the parliament at Holyrood has existed.

Calls for the full dualling of the route were being made in the 1980s.

Petitions were sent, safety campaigns were championed.

Elections were fought over promises to fix stretches of the road, including one from Alex Salmond before he became First Minister by winning the Gordon seat in 2007.

Fast forward to 2021, and Ms Sturgeon entered a co-operation deal with the Scottish Green Party knowing there would be difficult splits in policy and opinion.

The reality of the co-operation deal is becoming clear, and it could be another big problem for the SNP where the Conservatives are waiting to pounce.

Plans to dual the A96 stood out as one of the eye-catching bits in the “agree to disagree” section of the SNP-Green agreement.

It is in that category for good reason – our relationship with motoring and fossil fuels has to change.

But the impression is being allowed to form that this deal is a win for the SNP and the Greens, despite clearly competing ambitions.

Ian Blackford, the SNP Westminster, insisted safety plans will go ahead. It was said with enough ambiguity to please both camps.

Green MSP Maggie Chapman suggests there’s an expectation a review will stop the dualling.

They can’t both be right.