Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

EXCLUSIVE: New Eljamel victory forces doctors’ watchdog to reveal complaints against Dundee surgeon

Campaigners given another major boost as General Medical Council must release files detailing concerns about ex-NHS Tayside doctor

Sam Eljamel operated at Ninewells for years and is said to have harmed dozens of patients.
Sam Eljamel operated at Ninewells for years and is said to have harmed dozens of patients.

Victims of disgraced surgeon Sam Eljamel have won another victory in their hunt for answers after a top UK doctors’ watchdog was ordered to reveal complaints lodged against him.

Lead campaigner Pat Kelly had pushed for all concerns about the former NHS Tayside neurosurgeon to be shared by the General Medical Council (GMC).

He hopes his victory will help shed further light on the scandal once the relevant data is made public.

It comes just weeks after campaigners who were harmed by Mr Eljamel finally won their long-running fight to secure a public inquiry into the scandal.

Lead campaigner Pat Kelly. Image: Kim Cessford/DC Thomson.

The rogue doctor repeatedly botched operations and harmed patients when he was employed at Ninewells Hospital between 1995 and 2013.

An internal review published by NHS Tayside in August exposed huge failings which paved the way for an inquiry to be announced.

In the meantime, campaigner Mr Kelly, from Dundee, was pushing the General Medical Council on its refusal to declare all complaints it had received.

The medical body, which keeps a register of all doctors working in Britain, argued it was not compelled to answer Mr Kelly’s questions.

Bosses claimed they could not get consent from Eljamel to release his personal information since he fled Scotland years ago and is believed to be in Libya.

However, it was ruled by UK information regulators that the need for the truth over concerns about Eljamel was stronger than his right to privacy.

‘Major victory’

Hailing the decision, Mr Kelly told us: “I feel this is a major victory for me and another major step to get at the truth of who knew what and when.

“I believe it is a wake-up call for all medical organisations who think they can keep their secrets hidden away from public scrutiny.

“I want to know when the General Medical Council and NHS Tayside actually knew about his negligent practices.”

For a long time NHS Tayside bosses claimed they had been unaware of any concerns about Eljamel’s behaviour prior to 2013.

Ninewells Hospital
Mr Eljamel worked at Ninewells Hospital. Image: Steve Brown/DC Thomson

Yet the health board’s landmark report admitted patients had raised the alarm about the shamed neurosurgeon as early as 2011.

Whistleblowers have previously alleged medical staff brought forward concerns in 2009, four years before Eljamel’s eventual suspension.

In his questions to the doctors’ watchdog, Mr Kelly has specifically asked for bosses to share all complaints on record from 1995 onwards.

Disgraced surgeon Eljamel voluntarily removed himself from the General Medical Council’s register in 2015, barring him from practising in the UK again.

Shortly afterwards Mr Kelly had asked the doctors’ watchdog to disclose all complaints that had been brought forward against the rogue medic.

He appealed to the Information Commissioner’s Office when the General Medical Council refused to comply.

At the time, they rejected his plea and claimed it would “not be fair” and “distressing” to Eljamel if the information was released.

A General Medical Council spokesperson said: “We note the Information Commissioner’s decision, which we are currently reviewing.”

 

Conversation